Would you give your life?
Would you give your life to save a lot , and be not be known, or would you risk your life to save one person and be regarded as a hero.
Save Many
Side Score: 4
|
Hero
Side Score: 4
|
|
|
|
2
points
Risking your life for one other person a glory seems really narcissistic. I'd much rather save many and receive the glory of entering Heaven (don't debate me on the afterlife, we can get into that another time). Although it would also help to know who the many people were (like the entire KKK cult?) or the one person (the president?). That little fact would sway my decision. Side: Save Many
Well if I'm going to die I might as well save as many as I possibly can. If I was going to save 1 person it would have to be somebody extremely important. Someone who was going to change the world for the better, or invent the cure for cancer... If it was just some homeless man who gives a flying fuck!? Side: Save Many
|
Lead by example. It's the most rational approach, I think, to teach someone the value of risking someone's life for another's than teach a lot of people nothing and let them live. If everyone wants to be a hero because they know how great it is to be saved, no one will absolutely have to die, ever. Side: dont give but teach
2
points
|