CreateDebate


Debate Info

14
16
Yes No
Debate Score:30
Arguments:29
Total Votes:32
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes (13)
 
 No (13)

Debate Creator

Atrag(5538) pic



Would you let a kindergarten teacher accused of sexual abuse care for your kids?

Yes

Side Score: 14
VS.

No

Side Score: 16
2 points

If the teacher was once merely accused, I won’t likely know about it.

Why? Thinking of ways to fuck people over?

Side: Yes
Atrag(5538) Disputed
1 point

You seem unable to answer my question.

.

Side: No
Amarel(4987) Disputed
1 point

It’s too vague. .

Side: Yes
Atrag(5538) Disputed
1 point

For certain under UK law the accusation would show in a criminal record check, even if not further action is taken by the police. In the US there is also a chance that it would show up on a record check: https://www.datacheckinc.com/blog/2017/01/will-background-check-show-arrest-not-lead-conviction/

Side: No
Amarel(4987) Disputed
1 point

An accusation isn’t sufficient to give police probable cause to arrest. So if someone merely accused a teacher of sexual abuse, I wouldn’t likely know about it. If an accusation lead to an arrest, then the police had probable cause to believe the accusation and I may feel differently about the teacher in question.

Side: Yes
1 point

Would you let a kindergarten teacher accused of sexual abuse care for your kids?

Depends on who's accusing them. If it's the Democrats or Marxists, I'd let them take care of my kids twice knowing the tyrants had to have vetted the teacher like a terrorist and that they must have come up with nothing. Libs consider actual child molesters as one of their own and never rat out their own.

Harvey Weinstein? Lib.

Catholic priests? Libs.

Jared Fogle? Lib.

Josh Duggar? Lib.

Roman Polanski? Lib.

Brett Kavanaugh? Accuser's ex says she's lying.

Accuser has connections to FBI agents who worked Hillary Clinton's case and let her off.

Accuser said she was afraid of flying, yet has flown hundreds of times provably, and her ex says she never mentioned it.

Accuser says she's deathly afraid of closed spaces. The ex says she never mentioned it.

Accuser's acquaintences say her up-tone at the end of her sentences during the hearing was faked in order to sound like a child and get empathy.

Accuser says she has never helped someone pass a lie detector test. Her ex says that's a lie.

Accuser can't remember where said "assault" happened, who brought her, nor who took her home.

Accuser's "witness" says she was intimidated in an attempt by Ford's legal team to change her testimony and say she witnessed the assault, which was revealed by the 7th FBI investigation of Kavanaugh in an interview of said witness.

Rachel Mitchell, sexual assault expert and questioner listed out 35 inconsistencies in the accuser's story in her report.

The point?

1)Libs defend or ignore proven molesters all of the time.

2)The frame job by the liberal mob rule didn't work.

3)Only Communist Stalinists declare someone guilty with nerry a shred of evidence.

4)Your teacher analogy was pitiful. Better luck next time.

Side: Yes
Atrag(5538) Disputed
1 point

Insincere political blah blahs

.

Side: No
Amarel(4987) Clarified
1 point

Her account of arguing with her husband over an additional door due to fears of single exits, thus leading to therapy was also discounted. Said therapy was in 2012 while said door turns out to have been installed in 2008 as an additional entrance (not exit) for an additional room to be rented out to college students.

Side: Yes

If they were accused, and then it was found that they accusation was correct, no. I wouldn’t. If they were just accused, there’s no evidence to suggest that they are a Pedo. So, in that case, I would hire them.

Side: Yes
Atrag(5538) Disputed
2 points

Thats very liberal of you. I would say most people wouldn't want to trust someone to look after their kids if another kid has accused them of sexual abuse.

Side: No
Amarel(4987) Disputed
1 point

I would say most people are reasonable enough to consider the circumstances of the accusation and investigation. Baseless accusations do get made, and investigations often determine it.

Side: Yes
2 points

No. Not always, but more often than not there is no smoke without fire.

Paedophiles are known to be masters at concealing their condition, so where a doubt exists it would be diminished-responsibility not to withdraw your child/children from the establishment where the accused worked.

Side: No
1 point

Are you that teacher??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Side: No
Atrag(5538) Disputed
1 point

Women have the right to choose. You don't get to say that they can't abort fetuses after 5 weeks. Fascist!

Side: Yes
Redeemed(1230) Disputed
1 point

Leave me alone, or you will be sorry...............................................................................................................................

Side: No

No!

Who would want admitted Pedophiles caring for our children? The Left is fighting for Pedophile rights for past admitted Pedophiles, who now want the right to have jobs around children.

https://www.afa.net/the-stand/culture/2019/05/it-s-not-the-equality-act-it-s-the-pedophile-protection-act/

Side: No
1 point

No. I wouldn't want anyone accused of it caring for my kids. I know that may not be fair if they are accused but possibly innocent however the suspicion is there and that's going to be enough for me.

Side: No