Would you say nothing if they had late term tests to see if the Baby was Gay & then abort?
It is interesting that FromWithin thinks that gay people will have just as hard a life as people with Down Syndrome. It is clear that FromWithin wants to make life miserable for every single gay person so their life is just as bad as someone with Down Syndrome. Can you believe that FromWithin could have so much hatred that he wants to ruin the life of every single gay person? Yeah....so...I would also say it should be legal to abort a Downs baby. In fact...parents should have the right to abort a fetus for any mental or physical problem that would most likely negatively impact the kids life. Thus placing undue and unfair emotional and financial burdens on the parents. I bet if that retarded or deformed or even gay fetus was capable of voting that it too would vote to just go to sleep forever than to enter several decades of a tough and impaired life. I am a Libertarian. A womans body is her own damn business. Keep your damn reactionary and religiously deluded politics away from her right to choose! Who are you to force the parents into a life of grief? All for a mutated or compromised bundle of nerves cells? OK..I got that out for all to see! Now go ahead and ban me you fascist idiot. Thanks!!! This argument is incredibly ridiculous and has holes everywhere. Essentially, they're saying that just because someone who is born LGBTQ may/will likely experience some hardships in their life, they should be aborted? This doesn't make sense at all to me. Those with mental disorders, such as Down's Syndrome, are primarily dealing with impairments while those who are LGBTQ deal with discrimination. The two situations just don't equate. The major reason why this topic is so troubling to me: it essentially argues that there is some validity in aborting a minority that might suffer from discrimination in the future. This is way too easily translatable to other minorities, such as non-white minorities. This is a very dangerous statement to even try to latch onto because, frankly, it's ignorant and fueled by a general lack of thought. Yeah....so....i am not sure I understand the question here. But I think it is as!king if a parent should have the legal right, the option to abort a second or third trimester fetus....NOT a baby, btw...if some sort of test determined that said fetus was of homosexual or lesbo orientation. Right? Cool. Before I progress I need to tell you that such tests do not yet exist, and may never, as we have yet to detect a so called gay gene. Too, the possible existence of said gene is debated by biologists. Back to the Q..... Yes! I feel it is the parents right, even their Constitutional right...by dint of the Pursuit of Happiness and liberty clause..to decide if they want to raise a gay child. Please do not come back at my opinion here with the tired old.....But what about the rights of the kid? Because...the fetus is not yet a child. Only a bundle of cells and nerves the size of your fist. Not even a human being. Thus....the idea of its rights are moot. The cognitive abilities of that fetus are equal to that of a fish, some neuro!ogists claim. Last I heard fishies don't have rights! LOL Thanks. Well, yeah, you are correct. A rational and objective person would not be able to dispute my stance since I am pro choice all the way. As mentioned in my post above. But ya gotta remember who we are dealing with! So this dolt banned me anyway. From one of these debates. And by the time you read this I will most likely be banned here as well. Which, hey...is actually a badge of honor. Getting FromWithinHisAss to ban you. As that means you engaged in logical left.of.fascist thinking! Thanks! 1
point
|