CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:
Arguments with the highest score are displayed first.
Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument.
To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.
To vote for an argument, use these icons:
You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument.
Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change.
Yes, you can change your vote.
Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account.
All scores are updated in real-time.
To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.
When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument.
If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.
"Atheists can't have any morals, because morals come from God, and the bible! That's why you're all so wicked..."
So what's the implication here? It's that religious people are moral, and atheists are not, because morality can only come from a supreme being who sets rules, and enforces them...
Every theist who has EVER said this is admitting that they themselves are only NOT killing, raping and stealing because they're afraid that God will see them in their moment of evil, and smite them for it.
"You atheists don't believe in heaven and hell, so why would you bother to NOT rape my girlfriend and then kill her? I mean, I'd have done it myself, but God would have punished me for it later, so instead I did the human thing and formed a caring relationship."
... What truly astounds me is just how frightening an admission this is. Surely, we've all heard this "myth" uttered by someone, haven't we?
And each time someone says it, what they're REALLY saying is "The only reason I don't commit unspeakable crimes is because I'm afraid of eternal judgment and torture. I'm dead-set on going to heaven, so no raping for me!"
It really is that scary. I tend to give even the people who make this nonsensical claim the benefit of the doubt that they're just ignorant, not terrifying close to committing a horrible crime, but what if they really meant it?
What if these people - who sadly represent the majority here in America - are really only NOT committing every heinous act they can think of because they're afraid of the cosmic judge in the sky who will hold them accountable for every misdeed? What kind of sociopath would genuinely ONLY not kill and rape because they know they'll get caught?
Well, next time someone asks you how an atheist can possibly have morals, take a good look. You've either met a moron, or someone capable of the most evil crimes imaginable if they thought for a second - as you do, dear reader - that god is a fairy-tale.
Atheists don't do good because we expect to go to heaven, or fear going to hell; Atheists do good because we want to.
Why don't all atheists commit murders and go on theft-heavy crime-sprees? Because we wouldn't like it if people stole from us, or tried to kill us... We have basic human empathy, just like most theists.
I genuinely don't believe even most of the people who ask such an incredibly insulting question honestly believe what they're saying, because how could they?
OF COURSE you don't need a holy book to tell you right from wrong - especially when the scriptures for "the big three" religions especially are full of actual endorsements of murder and rape and misogyny, and every other evil thing a bronze-age man could possibly imagine.
Us atheists are good people because we want to be. We don't treat people badly because we ourselves don't want to be treated badly. This isn't hard to fathom.
So next time someone asks you, as an atheist, how you could possibly have any morality, ask them as a theist how they could possibly be AGAINST stoning to death disobedient children. Or killing people for working on Sundays. Or locking women away during their period, for the protection of men.
THESE are the morals of the bible... If you THINK morality comes from a holy book, then holy shit, are you ever deluded.
If they don't rather quickly realize just how stupid a question they just posed to you, you need to run away; You've just met someone who only doesn't kill you because they're afraid of the seat that would save them in hell...
And for some reason, that psychopath thinks YOU have issues with morality. Go figure.
To reference the bible in a Debate is to say, you are not prepared for said debate. In order to put forth your argument, it is "Your" burden to quote, reference, or speak on the topic of Genesis. Not the responder. So, I AM Willing to debate you on this topic and will never ask you to go look up something. If there is something I choose to use as evidential, referencing, quote, etc.... it will be MY burden to speak it here. Not to send my opponent on a research mission on my behalf. In other words, if you wish to take me up on this debate, I only ask that you reference that which you know, have read, etc. And I will do the same. But to tell someone to "Go Read this or that" Defeats the very purpose of a DEBATE. Debates take place.......In the debate.....Not somewhere else. Your move.
So you chose one negative argument, out of all of the completely rational ones, to defend your point. What about the people on the opposing side who chose no, just because he is an atheist? You are a hypocrite.
If they I agreed with what they planned on doing and I trusted them I would vote for any one no matter what religious views or lack of religious views they held as long as they were not going to impose them on other people.
If they I agreed with what they planned on doing and I trusted them I would vote for any one no matter what religious views or lack of religious views they held as long as they were not going to impose them on other people.
If they I agreed with what they planned on doing and I trusted them I would vote for any one no matter what religious views or lack of religious views they held as long as they were not going to impose them on other people.
All that matters is if they can do the job and that they'll look after the people right, if they can do that they've got my vote their releigion is irrelevant
I would tolerate a president who doesn't inflict biblical morals as laws upon the society much more, and kept my admiration towards him for his real hard work. - But i don't see really a point in voting for someone just because of his religion or culture, still I might have an idea. We choose a man or a woman who can represent us to other countries. And I wouldn't want to be part of the failure if that occurs.
In order for this to be a "Debate in the first place", the "Voting" as a default fails as a debate. The very act of the vote is to negate or ignore the validity of the debate in the first place. Can any one of you honestly expect someone of "Faith" to vote for a Atheist? This is not a debate. It is the lack there of.
Isn't it weird that we have this concept that people of all faiths and non believers are being forced to vote for Christians only, but it is unthinkable for someone of faith to vote for an Atheist?
Of coarse I would! Why wouldn't I or anyone else? To simply vote for someone based on their religious or non religious views is simply ignorant and closed minded.
Of coarse I would! Why wouldn't I or anyone else? To simply vote for someone based on their religious or non religious views is simply ignorant and closed minded.
If this candidate held the same values POLITICALLY as me NOT RELIGIOUSLY, then i would. Makes common sense. Why would you vote for someone who you think might let their religious beliefs cloud their thinking?
I surely would. It shows that this candidate is not scared to stand up for his beliefs even in a world of politics. Someone who can be so confident and transparent about their thoughts and morals will make a satisfying leader.
The Atheist isn't gonna blame god for everything but take responsibility. Religion kills responsibility. Our former Presidents used too much religion. The USA uses the "Bible" to kill gay people's writes to marry each other. More likely the Atheist president will try his best to ignore those homophobic phrases in the bible. Plus he can change the fact that the USA uses religion for everything. Change the in God we trust motto. Change the one Nation under god verse in the flag. That's why I don't say the pledge.
Though the vast majority of the citizens of our country are Christian, we are not a Christian nation. God is mentioned nowhere in the Constitution and plenty of our Founding Fathers weren't Christian, either.
Though the vast majority of the citizens of our country are Christian, we are not a Christian nation. God is mentioned nowhere in the Constitution and plenty of our Founding Fathers weren't Christian, either.
Yes, but many weren't at the same time. Many of them were deists and if they were Christians they weren't devout followers of their claimed religious orientation.
Yes, but many weren't at the same time. Many of them were deists and if they were Christians they weren't devout followers of their claimed religious orientation.
I want you to give me exactly what makes a Christian good and why that would make that person a good leader. Would you consider anyone who is a pope to be a good Christian? Because if history proves anything its that popes are corrupt to. Christians are just as susceptible as Atheists to being corrupt and being a bad leader, heck look no further than George W. Bush for that.
Haha. You're very closed minded and stupid. If I had a dollar for every person that said they were a Christian but weren't showing it, id be filthy rich. A religious person isn't any better or smarter than a non religious person.
Haha. You're very closed minded and stupid. If I had a dollar for every person that said they were a Christian but weren't showing it, id be filthy rich. A religious person isn't any better or smarter than a non religious person.
So you blatantly admit that your religion brings discrimination to the table?
The candidate may share your views on same sex marriage(among other pressing issues), with a different reason, one perhaps found more so in logic other than faith. Yet this still would not cause you to vote for them?
I hate to agree with such an accusatory view point, but in almost all situations it seems true. Christians contradict their teachings, and their teachings are even full of contradictions.
So you blatantly admit that your religion brings discrimination to the table?
I wouldn't say that I am in a religion. I hate religion but love Jesus. Christianity is about being in a relationship with Christ. Religion is man's way to get to God. Christianity's is God trying to reach man.
The candidate may share your views on same sex marriage(among other pressing issues), with a different reason, one perhaps found more so in logic other than faith. Yet this still would not cause you to vote for them?
A lot of atheists I know would want same sex marriage to be legalized because they think it should be equal.
Your statements on religion, was a run around version of saying "I'm a Christian".
As for your statement of atheists, you say, and I quote "A lot of atheists I know would want same sex marriage to be legalized because they think it should be equal.'
If you can't say with absolutely surety that every single atheist is for equal marriages, then you are discriminating for counting any atheist candidate out.
as for your reasoning, of why you wouldn't elect an atheist president, is your only issue same sex marriage? Do you honestly feel that the most important issue that a president will face is what he'll do about same sex marriage?
Don't get me wrong. if you are discriminatory, that's your right, and I wouldn't try to or even care to change you. I doubt you're the only person who would vote based on such superficial things as race, ethnicity, or religion.