CreateDebate


Debate Info

48
50
YES!! no
Debate Score:98
Arguments:67
Total Votes:106
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 YES!! (45)
 
 no (36)

Debate Creator

123456789101(86) pic



are gays freaks on nature

YES!!

Side Score: 48
VS.

no

Side Score: 50

Yes they are freaks of nature who (in my opinion) deserve to die. We humans were created to marry the opposite sex. why do you think women have holes (vagina's) were a mans penis can fit perfectly inside. and gays are like malfunctioned humans. they are like a computer virus. we have to eliminate it before it corrupts the world. if people were meant to be gay (aka worthless) then would we not be designed to accommodate people being faggoty freaks? answer me that faggoty freak supporters.

Side: YES!!
Hellno(17753) Disputed
5 points

Guys have holes too... just sayin'

Side: no
1 point

Well said. As a Biologist with a strong virology background I liked your metaphor comparing gays to a virus in dire need of immediate eradication. Thanks!

Side: YES!!
1 point

Sure they are just take a look at Bruce (Catlin) Jenner all the proof that needs to be seen !

Side: YES!!
Cartman(18192) Disputed
1 point

How exactly are we supposed to learn about gays by looking at someone who isn't gay?

Side: no
outlaw60(15368) Disputed
1 point

So Bruce (Catlin) Jenner is not gay ? Prove that point if you will !

Side: YES!!
1 point

In a way they are, if they are born Gay, since that sort of genetic disposition and sexual preference does go against the norm. So if you consider a freak to be anybody who is different than 90% of the homo sapien population, than sure, you can have it your way and call Gays freaks. I have no problem with that as a Biologist.

Since I DO believe in Evolution, and homos and lesbos do nothing to help the evolutionary process. I am very surprised they are still around, quite frankly, Most organisms with undesirable genetic mutations get what we call "out selected." That is, they do not live long enough to pass genes on to their progeny. Or even, in the matter of Gays, create progeny in the first place.

This is why TRUE Gays---those born with that inclination at birth, from a genetic pre-disposition, are very rare. Many so-called gays only select that lifestyle. Women gays---dykes--do this more often than men. Men are more often to be born Gay and women are more likely to become what we call "emotional lesbians."

Those that had some sort of bad experience with men, or with Daddy or male siblings, or maybe one night she had too many wine coolers and let the lacrosse team bang her. So she decides to come to the other side and do away with men and instead become a carpet muncher.

I would say that about half of lesbos are emotional lesbos, while about a full three-quarters of Gay men were born with that disposition. They knew from early childhood they were different. This is not the case with little girls nearly as often as with boys.

The definitive gay gene has yet to me encoded by us, but some geneticists say they have found strong evidence of it. Others say no. The jury is still out. But personally I DO feel there is such thing as a person being born gay. For whatever the reason. It is due to one of three things:

Genetic aberration in the part of the brain that controls sexual drive

A hormonal imbalance, i.e. too much or too little testosterone or estrogen.

An aberration in that final "wash" in the womb. (This gets too technical for you laymen, but basically we are all female for a time in the first trimester of gestation, until a "wash" or hormones envelopes the fetus and decides the theretofore permanent sex.)

http://www.afterellen.com/people/449983-new-study-sexuality-really-says-lesbians-bisexual-queer-women

Side: YES!!
1 point

Since I DO believe in Evolution, and homos and lesbos do nothing to help the evolutionary process. I am very surprised they are still around, quite frankly, Most organisms with undesirable genetic mutations get what we call "out selected." That is, they do not live long enough to pass genes on to their progeny. Or even, in the matter of Gays, create progeny in the first place.

I learned about a study on birds with homosexuality. A homosexual bird can help out its sister raising her kids. Since the homosexual bird is helping its genes survive since they are shared by the sister, the homosexual genes can survive.

Side: YES!!
1 point

Can you please give me your opinion on my Apple vs FBI debate.

Side: YES!!
1 point

No this is not good for the world

The minimum argument length is 50 characters. The purpose of this restriction is to cut down on the amount of dumb jokes, so we can keep the quality of debate and discourse as high as possible.

Side: YES!!
1 point

The minimum argument length is 50 characters. The purpose of this restriction is to cut down on the amount of dumb jokes, so we can keep the quality of debate and discourse as high as possible.The minimum argument length is 50 characters. The purpose of this restriction is to cut down on the amount of dumb jokes, so we can keep the quality of debate and discourse as high as possible.The minimum argument length is 50 characters. The purpose of this restriction is to cut down on the amount of dumb jokes, so we can keep the quality of debate and discourse as high as possible.

Side: YES!!
1 point

Yes because no one can be on nature it's not possible...

Side: YES!!

Gays should not be treated as freaks of nature but they should also not be lifted up to our children as just one more normal sexual orientation. It is not normal and should not be put forth as normal to our children going through puberty and experiencing sexual feelings.

If homosexuality were natural it would be in all our animals including our pets. I'm still waiting to see a Gay dog or cat or any other pet. Do you know of any pets who are exclusively Gay?

Side: YES!!
Firnen Clarified
2 points

Except homosexual behavior has been documented in various other species.

Side: YES!!
FromWithin(8241) Disputed
1 point

There has been no proof of other animals being strictly Gay unless some weird species no one would ever know about that is asexual, etc. They talk about some same sex Geese who pair up for life which means nothing unless they show them having sex and refusing to have sex with female geese.

Here are a couple quotes concerning supposed Gay birds...

"Bagemihl's research shows that homosexual behavior, not necessarily sex, has been documented in about 500 species as of 1999, ranging from primates to gut worms."

"'In geese you may find a very strong homosexual bond between two malegeese who behave like a [mating] pair even though they cannot copulate. They always forget that the other refuses to be mounted and they try again every spring. Each behaves in a perfectly normal male way and if he could speak he would say, 'I love my wife very much, but she's definitely frigid."

Birds can have sex with both sexs but are not exclusive to one sex.

Side: no
1 point

"If wings were natural they would be in all our animals including our pets. I'm still waiting to see a winged dog or cat. Do you know of any cats or dogs who exclusively fly"?

Side: no
1 point

I cannot help but wonder why the resident dyke is not weighing in on this?

Side: YES!!
IAmSparticus(1516) Clarified
1 point

If she is smart, it's because she sees the level of discourse that individuals like you are taking part in here.

Side: YES!!

Lets see, we have men who have strong bonds of friendships and share apartments for years but that does not make them Gay.

We have geese who have similar friendships for life and that does not make them Gay. Both male geese refuse to allow the other male goose to have unnatural sex with them. Gee, even Geese have that much sense.

This is the grasping at straws from pro Gay activists. This is the nonsense they will teach to our kids to try and make their sexual orientation as being normal and natural. It will never be.

Side: YES!!
3 points

Homosexuality has existed through all of history and is present in other species. Saying because they're rarer than the general population makes them freaks would be no different then saying any subgroup of the general population are freaks.

Side: no
1 point

Nope

Side: no
1 point

No! Just because someone is interested in the same sex doesn't mean they're freaks you jerks who said yes!!!!!!! 😣😢

Side: no
1 point

No, but bigots are. ........................................................

Side: no
1 point

Freaks on Nature? Huh? Sounds like a weird Discovery Channel show.

Side: no
darc9(1) Banned
1 point

We are raised to believe in co-ed marriage since we were young. It is natural for humans to follow what we have been taught all our lives and if anyone asks our opinion on gays we automatically tell them it is bad. Society has corrupted us to the point of where we can't even think for ourselves. I asked a teenage girl way before gay marriage was legal in all states if it was right for gays to be together, and she willingly told me no. I asked her opinion on it 3 weeks after it was legalized by Obama and she was happily saying that she loves the fact that we can all accept each other no matter their sex preference "hashtag love wins". There is nothing wrong with having a penis and liking a penis. If the doctors are right about it just being a easy fix by equaling the chemical hormones then so be it, but that does not necessarily mean they are "freaks". For example, male dogs will hump anyone or any object because it pleasures them, but we don't call them weirdos or freaks. We simply laugh and take it away from them. Same for humans! We like feeling pleasure so whatever works, works. No need to bully a male for enjoying pleasure.

Side: no