I like this website but some of the stuff need to change like if you want to challenge a person to a 1 vs 1 debate you would click on there profile and click on where you would message them but it would be below it and it would say challenge to debate and then you it would be an invitation to a 1 on 1 debate instead of a public debate.

Definitely this one. .

What would you think of a debate format where there are two opposing sides (original, right?), but everyone can only post something once. That isn't saying it very well, and calls for explanation. Let's say i put something on the "yes" side of a "yes/no" question. Instead of having a string of conversation (which I'm not putting down, I just observe that it makes for visual clutter), you select a "reply to" option, and we engage in a one on one conversation, either politely opposing each other, or talking about why we chose the same side. From there, there're lots of options: creating a plan to address whatever we are talking about (read: real world solutions), creating opposing groups dedicated to debating each other, with the desired outcome resolution/compromise, and formation of a solution.

Arguing is easy. Conceding anything is not.

Should teens be able to use dating websites. jfkhgdklpskjhghjgfdfgfdhfgdhjfgjdgfjhdgfjhsgfhjgsdjhfgsjhdfgjhsgfhjsdgfhjsdfhjdbchjdgsjgdshjfgshjfgsdhjfghjdsfdsfdfgddfgdgdfhdfhf