CreateDebate


Debate Info

10
1
yes no
Debate Score:11
Arguments:11
Total Votes:11
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 yes (7)
 
 no (1)

Debate Creator

warrior(1854) pic



do you agree with this guy's point?

Gun free zones? Getting 

yes

Side Score: 10
VS.

no

Side Score: 1

Yes I agree, ask your self this: why are kids walking into schools and malls and opening fire on kids, teachers and people shopping? Because not only is the person who is doing this have mental problems but they know no one who is a law abiding citizen will have a gun to defend them selfs. Tit for tat! Disarming honest people will do no good for anyone. We can't even keep felons from having fire arms.. Regardless of what the laws are the criminals will always have guns. Like the guy said, drugs are illegal, yes they cross the border everyday and end up in the hands of our kids. I hate to say it, but making new laws and bans will not stop the bad guy. There will always be bad people. We have one important job to do, and that is to fight back against these people. I don't know about anyone else but having a concealed weapon permit is the only way to defend our self in these mass shooting on gun free zones, thus making the innocent guilty but could save some lives in the event of a crazy walking around shooting kids, women and men.

Side: yes

... I really need to revise my thinking on some topics. The guy in the video makes a very straight-forward and logical argument.

Side: yes
1 point

I do, however, agree with his reasoning and conclusion in saying that banning all guns from the public, or banning gun manufacturers from distributing to the public is not a bright idea.

Side: yes

Yes. I support the 2nd Amendment for mentally stable people. I feel like mentally disabled people should be able to defend themselves against tyranny.

Side: yes
Cartman(18192) Disputed
1 point

Shouldn't you watch the video before you have an opinion on what he said? He talked about how ridiculously difficult it would be to have guns removed. The video didn't have anything to do with mental stability and supported the 2nd amendment.

Side: yes
1 point

Im sorry. Ill watch it now. If thats what he said, I agree. I was just stating my op on guns. Thank you. :)

Side: yes
1 point

I agree too much. It was scary. I was thinking "wtf is a gun free zone, how does that exist" then he said it!

Side: yes
1 point

Sort of, I think it's plausible that in certain privately owned properties, where mass shootings are not going to occur, that having a "ban" on guns coming in might be a good move.

A house where you could freak out the kiddies, or trigger someones PTSD might be a good example. Some police stations and schools already host signs stating that no one can bring guns in, of course that's not by any means a "gun free zone".

Side: no
warrior(1854) Disputed
2 points

Well as a gun owners er you certainly need to be smart about were you go with your gun. But his point was that a sign is not going to deter someone from breaking a law or rule if he/she was already intending to brake a more serious law to begin with.

Side: yes
Stickers(1037) Clarified
1 point

I understand that, I'm referring to the efficacy of gun free zones .

Side: yes
Stickers(1037) Clarified
1 point

A house where you could freak out the kiddies, or trigger someones PTSD might be a good example

left out the italicized bit

Side: yes