nagtroll is number one, for now. Behold his Glory.
Today is a special day in human history. Because today, for the first time ever, nagtroll rose to number one on the weekly leader board. This was not so in the past, and will not be so in the future. But right here, right now, nagtroll is number one.
**nagtroll is number one!!!**
**Let us sing his glory!!!**
(please leave your extolments below)
|
Congratulations. And I have to say, that your debates have been a mix of surprisingly if rare original insight, and completely ridiculous assumptions and quips. Either way though, there are a lot of them. And for the sake of hypocricy I would like to copy and paste here a few of you're tansferences/ironic comments to others in recent days: "Add the ability to shamelessly point grab, so people don't have to go through so much trouble. Like a big button that says Shameless Point Grab on it, and when you click it, it just adds more points to your side, so you don't have to actually try to do anything, or even look like you did." "High five. Down low. Your too slow. Ok now you are just trolling for points." and one to me, "Obviously you would have either gotten your point across by now, or accepted that you are unable to clearly express yourself. Either way there is no point in continuing to respond, and doing so is just a clear attempt at point grabbing." Well I can say nagtroll, that I have never sat in the lofty seat of most points in a week where you now grace. And even now this entire comment may be a shameless and desperate attempt to grab at your illusterous tails of coat greatness. Yes, it's true, the masses want quantity, quantity, QUANTITY! And perhaps this lowly quality I aspire to, has no place here at all. Congratulations. :) Side: quantity
Not only that, but his last five posts were all the exact same video just posted on five different debates. On the bring back the T-Rex debate he pretty much restated the same arguement multiple times. If you look at his waterfall you will not find an arguement that has reached over 2 points until you get to page 6. Side: quantity
1
point
Kukla, I suspect. Anyhow, the weekly "leader" board seems to me more of a weekly "I don't do anything good with my time as a human" board. So congratulations, if that's what you want to lead at. At least you're not the sorry bastard that is congratulating someone else for being the best at wasting time... Side: quantity
1
point
-233 points suggests this person is new, especially seeing as "he" is on the top of the weekly leader board. This person has been way busy lately, with only 233 points accumulated. It seems like this person, though "he" is new here, is all too familiar with playing the board. - This person uses the 'add "..."' method of getting around the 50 character limit, though it's common around here, with only 233 points this format should be the least interesting. - Three explanation points all over the place!!! I only know of a few that do this regularly. - You are here all the time, you were #1 for a long time too. Now you're number... 3, though... when "he" reached #1 I'm pretty sure you were at 4 or 5... As if you were slipping for... what? Were you not working as hard as you usually are??? What then could you be doing, while this "nagtroll" is climbing to #1? - Both of you use terms popular in the 60's 70's and 80's. I was born in the mid-late 80's, so hearing these terms or phrases reminds me of my parents. I can pick up on them well, is my point. - Both of you were logged in last, 4-5 hours ago... about one hour apart. Kukla being the last person to log out. Meaning, that it could be possible for "nagtroll" to see my arg, and then for nagtroll to log out, and Kukla log in, to respond to it. Interesting, yes? I could be wrong, these "createhate" and "nagtroll" names remind me of *Chan... but if that were the case, I think we'd have bigger problems. Idk how much lulz could ensue here though, so maybe they're trying? Side: quantity
1
point
|
