CreateDebate


Debate Info

0
4
yes - it should be limited no - it should NOT be limited
Debate Score:4
Arguments:3
Total Votes:4
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 no - it should NOT be limited (3)

Debate Creator

Prevaricate(57) pic



should Atty. General Holder limit the torture investigation

yes - it should be limited

Side Score: 0
VS.

no - it should NOT be limited

Side Score: 4
No arguments found. Add one!
1 point

"The Judiciary Act of 1789 created the Office of the Attorney General which evolved over the years into the head of the Department of Justice and chief law enforcement officer of the Federal Government."

thus, as the "chief law enforcement officer" he (Holder) has a Constitutional obligation to pursue all crimes without respect to favor, fortune or fear

Side: no - it should NOT be limited

I cannot think of one reason why they should limit them. That would hardly be fair to anyone who is or has been prosecuted under the torture rules. I say go for anyone and every one Holder thhinks he has a case against.

Side: no - it should NOT be limited
2 points

attn Kukla...:

unfortunately, the initial reports indicate that the investigation will be limited

but, to date, we are unsure as to how aggressive the special prosecutor, Ed Durham, is gonna be (as opposed to Fitzgerald's limited investigation of the Plame leak)

but we can assume that Durham will uncover the paper trail that will lead to the Bush White House and that the low level scape-goats will rat-out the higher-ups

Side: no - it should NOT be limited