CreateDebate


Debate Info

143
163
It should be illegal It should be legal
Debate Score:306
Arguments:202
Total Votes:407
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 It should be illegal (87)
 
 It should be legal (108)

Debate Creator

goodmale(1457) pic



should Zoophilia/Zoosexuality be legal

 I know there is a debate like this but it not active. I don't think people should be against something thats not even wrong. And please leave god out of this. To let you all know I will answer all your arguments

 I say a size limit should be medium dog size anything that is under a medium size dog is not legal. Anything thats bigger or as same as a medium size dog is legal. So were talking about animals that are a size medium dog or bigger.

And please look to the right to see if I are ready answered your question.

It should be illegal

Side Score: 143
VS.

It should be legal

Side Score: 163
4 points

Extremely barbaric to impose upon an unaware being. Can't imagine how this could be seen as "OK" by anyone. People attracted to other species should seek council to avoid raping any unsuspecting animals... how fucked up can people be

Side: It should be illegal
goodmale(1457) Disputed
2 points

This is not a argument. This is opinion. Please argue why it should be illegal and make your argument smart and long.

Side: It should be legal
pakicetus(1455) Clarified
2 points

He says that animals cannot consent properly.

Also, before you pull the "animals cannot consent to neutering" argument, I agree.

Side: It should be illegal
Kobidobidog(30) Disputed
1 point

What is typed does not have to be long. What is not given the zoo is what they already have and that is love that works no ill to their neighbor. Give them that love back. It is only fair to do so.

Side: It should be illegal
Kobidobidog(30) Disputed
1 point

Fucked up people think another person is less than they are.

Side: It should be legal
Kobidobidog(30) Disputed
1 point

To even have this conversation means there is no freedom. People need to work out their own salvation with fear and trembling rather than give the zoo fear and trembling. It should be a no brainier. Let zoo be legal. It is up to the individual to be good to the non human animals not working ill to them or another human being for that matter.

Side: It should be legal

It is like having sex with a young toddler. The animal can't consent to it like the child can't and also it would probably be traumatic and scary for the animal like how it would be for a young child.

Side: It should be illegal
thousandin1(1931) Clarified
3 points

Lacking a common language, a human cannot consent to sex with an animal either. In the case of a woman allowing herself to be mounted by, say, a dog, is she still raping the dog who has quite obviously chosen to mount her? Or is the dog raping her because the dog did not secure HER consent first?

Note: I do not condone zoophilia in any way, I just question the reasoning here and the assumption that it must be traumatic and scary. Mature animals may have an intellect on par with a toddler, but that doesn't make a sexually mature animal equivalent to a toddler. I'm also aware that you never said rape, but it's the logical extension when you're talking about inability to consent. Perhaps statutory rape would have been a better term.

Side: It should be illegal
goodmale(1457) Disputed
1 point

Alot of normal dogs will rape anything. If the dog has a bond with the woman then he would first ask in some way or form. After that the dog must understand your boby movements. If then you show your body movements to him in away your allowing it. He will then do the act that he wants to do. No she would not be rapping as long as she does not force it.

Side: It should be legal
goodmale(1457) Disputed
1 point

If I cut my brain apart to get at equal level so there would be no taking advantage of. Then would you allow it or would you still come up with another lame excuse.

Side: It should be legal
1 point

People need to fear God not people saying whoever or whatever did not consent. I guess body language means nothing then. The dog does not give a damn. It will hump anything. People need to fear he that is not seen being sure that their tender mercies are not cruel to whoever whatever activity including sex. That eliminates laws leaving whoever accountable to God. People are not immortal you know.

Side: It should be illegal
J-Roc77(70) Clarified
2 points

What you are looking for is something called "informed consent" and not just consent.

Two adults have the mental capacity AND background knowledge to know the risks and other issues that go along with this type of relationship.

While an animal may have sex with a willing participant they are not informed of the negative/positive issues that stem from these relationships.

In this context the animal is being taken advantage of.

If you believe animals do have this capacity and base your decision on this factor then you should have no problem with animal testing. This is not saying you can find another reason to disagree with animal testing.

Side: It should be illegal
goodmale(1457) Disputed
2 points

I am fully aware that the idea of informed consent in legal circles is different and much stricter. I do not mean legal/informed consent when I say consent. No one who has a pet, no one who has partook in any animal derived products has ever had informed consent from any animals. It is an impossibility even for humans to give perfect informed consent because it presupposes that both parties are perfectly aware of the consequences of an action. Something that requires the ability to predict the future with 100% certainty.

In practice what is meant by informed consent is that one party discloses any information about the interaction which may reasonably be expected to affect the other’s decision. If one party does not have the information it cannot be given. If the other party is incapable of receiving the information it is not considered a requirement.

I can't keep typing, The rest of this argument is on the right of the page. Please read all.

Side: It should be legal
goodmale(1457) Disputed
1 point

It can be either way around the animal may take advantage of it. Or the human may take advantage of it. I am just fine on animal testing as long as we do it to humans too. You can say the same for humans. Animals know most of the negative/positive issues that stem from relationships.

Side: It should be legal
goodmale(1457) Disputed
1 point

informed consent. Then how are we to feed are animals if we can't inform them the risks and rewards. Then how are we to give shots if we can't inform them the risks and rewards. Then how are we to even own them if we can't inform them of the risks and rewards of that. Then how are we to neuter and spay if we can't inform them the risks and rewards. If we can't give informed consent to them. Then all this is wrong. And it should be banned too.

Side: It should be legal
goodmale(1457) Disputed
1 point

If I cut my brain apart to get at equal level so there would be no taking advantage of. Then would you allow it or would you still come up with another lame excuse.

Side: It should be legal
goodmale(1457) Disputed
2 points

If animals can't consent we should bann everything. If you say animals can't consent then it is wrong to neuter animals because they can't consent too it. Then it is also wrong to put animals in kennels because they can't consent to it. Then it is also wrong to hunt animals because they can't consent to it. Then it is also wrong to put collars and cloths on a animal because they can't consent to it. Then it is also wrong to even own a animal because they can't consent to it. Then it is also wrong to keep the animals fenced in because they can't consent to it.

Side: It should be legal
1 point

Absense of consent would not make things that are in the animals best interest immoral. The issue then would be what the person truly believed was in the animals best interest - though this would be a measure of morality not whether something should be legal.

If an animal does not consent to being our pet, the harm done is that the animal becomes our pet; if an animal does not consent to sex, then it is basically being raped - the harms/benefits of those two scenarios are drastically different.

Side: It should be illegal
Kobidobidog(30) Disputed
1 point

Love is what is need to be given to beings who already have it. The ranter is void of it. Your complaining makes you righteous? people use probably and maybe not having a clue. You are not the judge. Guess who is?

Side: It should be legal
Kobidobidog(30) Disputed
1 point

We are responsible to one unseen being for what we do good or evil. People put others in bondage trying to give their form of justice. They are giving people fear. It is up to us to not see God as fire. When a human tries to give justice they end up giving fire. Satan is the one who gives fire. We need to give the water of life. The holy spirit is he water of life and the comforter. That is what we need in us.

Side: It should be legal
goodmale(1457) Disputed
0 points

Often they are compared to children because of their position in our society, and from hence we hear the argument that they can't consent and that sex with animals is akin to child abuse. The flaw in this argument is that while there are some similarities, the differences are much greater. Namely that adult animals can hunt for their own food, care for themselves, raise their own young and most importantly are sexually mature.

Side: It should be legal
Zoroaster(2) Disputed
1 point

Yet of all the differences you listed, one similarity makes them irrelevant: neither has the emotional or mental capability to give consent.

Side: It should be illegal
0 points

Whether it is equal to sexually abusing a child or not doesn't matter. The point is it is immoral for the reasons I posted earlier.

Side: It should be illegal
0 points

As I'm sure Goodmale would say, if you give a baby your nipple, it's agreeing to sex because it's not turning away.

Side: It should be illegal
goodmale(1457) Disputed
2 points

Don't be stupid kid. I don't allow stupid comments. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Side: It should be legal
2 points

Posting the debate several times won't make more people agree with you. Just for fun though, say we all agree that it should. What would this prove? I mean I am asking you, goodmale personally, what will be achieved by having some nobodies agree with you that zoosexuality isn't wrong, and should be legal?

Side: It should be illegal
goodmale(1457) Disputed
1 point

It would not prove anything knowing that it has already been proven in many states and some countrys. Made this debate because there was to like this that was removed. I just samply here because some people still believe it wrong.

Side: It should be legal
Kobidobidog(30) Clarified
1 point

What is wrong is breaking God's laws. People are accountable to God when the break them. Proverbs 12:10 -

King James Version (KJV) A righteous man regardeth the life of his beast: but the tender mercies of the wicked are cruel.

It is up to you to keep that law. keep it see God's light as light.

Side: It should be illegal

You're kidding right? You have to be one sick fuck to be on the other side of this debate. >_>

Side: It should be illegal
goodmale(1457) Disputed
1 point

If you think this is sick. Post a serious argument way you think this is sick.

Side: It should be legal
2 points

youre a freaking monkey loving douche-surf! this is sick stuff and people that like it should be strung up by their scrotum and shocked with a car battery!

Side: It should be illegal
goodmale(1457) Disputed
1 point

Do you have anything to prove that. Please post long and smart! arguments. This is not smart or a agreement. It just your opinion.

Side: It should be legal

I don't see the problem with having sex with zoos, because it can not consent or disapprove.

It's just like using a fleshlight, there is nothing wrong with it.

Side: It should be illegal
goodmale(1457) Disputed
2 points

Don't post if your not going to say something smart. !!!!!!!!!!!

Side: It should be legal
Intangible(4933) Disputed
5 points

Then you shouldn't be posting at all.

Side: It should be illegal

In places where zoosexual acts are legal, animal brothels are being established.

ref, ref

Do the zoophiles here believe this is a good consequence or a bad consequence of the acts being legal?

Side: It should be illegal
goodmale(1457) Disputed
2 points

I am not for what they do because they don't let animal have a choice and there selling sex at farms.

Side: It should be legal
1 point

Does that impact whether you think it should be legal?

Side: It should be illegal
1 point

Alright goodmale, how am I a hypocrite for thinking animals cannot consent?

Side: It should be illegal
goodmale(1457) Disputed
2 points

Are you for neutering/spaying or anything that has things to do with consent. Also you still have to show a example of how they can't consent and maybe give links if you can. I can simply give one right know showing they can consent example, Asking your dog if it needs to go out side and then the dog will show body language trying to say yes or no. I know this is weak example but there are a lot more.

Side: It should be legal
hannah165(520) Disputed
0 points

Are you for neutering/spaying or anything that has things to do with consent.

I am for neutering and spaying because it is for the good of the species. There are 5-7 million homeless animals in the world, and 3-4 million are killed in shelters because they can't find a home. Neutering and spaying helps prevent this. Of course they cannot consent to this, because they're animals, and you're their master.

There are laws against 40 year olds having sex with 10 year olds, even if the 10 years olds consent. Do you know why? It's because the 40 year old is much more experienced, and in turn, has a lot of power over the 10 year old. (The same laws apply to therapist having sex with their clients, teachers having sex with their students, etc.) It is considered statutory rape.

The reason that these laws are in place (position of power) could also be applied to the reason you can't have sex with your dog. Your dog isn't as intelligent as a human being and you're his master. These are both reasons why you are in a position of power. If we were to legalize having sex with animals, it would put us in an uncomfortable position; where do we draw the line? Can 40 year olds then start having sex with 10 year olds, since the position of power doesn't seem to matter?

Side: It should be illegal
goodmale(1457) Disputed
2 points

Also lets make a scenario in saying you are right and it does become illegal in the hole world. So here that would be more bad then good because zoophilia and bestilty will still do it and there would be like 2 million more crime cases in the world and america and other countries don't have the space or money and supplies to deal with 2 million prisoners. It would be like D day but a 100 times bigger !!!

Also there will be alot of suicides and some of us will not go down with out a fight and that will mean killings. I mean I don't think you would want to be killed just because you split up love.

Also even for people that don't do the act again and don't commit suicide. What would you tell them on how to satisfy there sexaul feelings because you can't say live alone then your will be the wrong one and you can't say either find a human because most have already tried that.

Side: It should be legal
hannah165(520) Clarified
2 points

Well, I haven't done much research, but I was under the impression that it's already illegal in most of the world?

And do you have any idea how many Zoophiliacs there are in the world? Again, it isn't something I've done research on.

Side: It should be illegal
1 point

Zoophile is just horrible to think about. This is a gross thing to do, and why do you want it legal. Not only is the idea of it mentally scaring, it's a horrible sin. If you think the bible doesn't like gay marriage, imagine going outside your own species with you sex life. Doing this shows you don't care about finding the love of you life. This is like multiplying a sexual predator by one hundred. What people see in that I don't now, and I sure don't think that should be legal.

Side: It should be illegal
Kobidobidog(30) Disputed
2 points

What is horrible are people saying nothing good at all. Obviously those that do don't thkink it is gross otherwise they would not do it. God's laws are not there to say, AH, Ha now I cam n arrest you. The bible wants people to bear one anothers burdens. Legal system does just the opposite. We are to not work ill to people. Legal system does just the opposite. People against the zoo use that evil legal system against them breaking God's laws. I don't advocate marrying another species. They don't know what marriage is. That makes the ritual pointless.

Side: It should be legal
Coldthedog(244) Disputed
1 point

So should we open Greek Orge Houses again. Go back to human sacrifices for fun like the Egyptians did. Make rape legal, I want to see 10 year olds in porn videos. Why, because this guy is atheist. What, the legal system isn't made to conform to things such as these just because Kobidobidog feels like it should. Too bad. :3

Side: It should be illegal

Definitely illegal - you might create a son of a "bitch"... ;)

Side: It should be illegal
1 point

The way I see it, animals are like children or underage teens. There is no way that they can give you absolute consent. During sex there could be no communication to assure the human or animal that what is happening is okay. There are so many issues with this and that is only the one that stands out to me the most. I am a very liberal individual and am a huge supporter of all types of sexual orientations... as long as each party is able and willing. Consent is the number one most important quality in any type of relationship and an animal is simply not equipped to give that to a human.

Side: It should be illegal
0 points

This is one of the most disgusting things I've ever heard. What kind of freak wants to have sex with an animal?

Side: It should be illegal
Zoroaster(2) Clarified
1 point

While I completely agree that this is an odd sexual orientation and many may find it disturbing, it is a sexuality nonetheless and we should treat it as such.

Side: It should be illegal
4 points

I was against it a little. But know I see that zoophili or zoosexual. Are people too they feel in a different way. I don't think they like that there even a human. I think there should be limits too. And that zoophili and zoosexual should be allowed. I think there people that are just misunderstood.

Side: It should be legal
2 points

If a rapist or serial killer is just misunderstood or feels in a different way, should that make their actions legal?

Side: It should be illegal
Igivefacts(64) Disputed
4 points

There is a difference between killing and loving. A killer is still a killer even if he or she is misunderstood. A love or lover is still a love or lover even if he or she is misunderstood.

Side: It should be legal
goodmale(1457) Disputed
2 points

No, Because what they did was wrong. Someone got hurt that why what they did was wrong. If they are on a bad pill from the doctor and can't control there acts. Then yes still wrong. But it was not all is fault. Oww sorry this was not my argument. My fault. I say sorry again.

Side: It should be legal
3 points

It's actually legal in Denmark and Sweden although. Doesn't mean you are allowed to maltreat the animals though.

Side: It should be legal
1 point

what do you mean by, (you are not allowed to maltreat the animal)

Never mind I know what it means know.

Side: It should be legal
2 points

Occasionally people cite health concerns as a reason bestiality should not be legal. Maybe that is because some people associate "lower" animals as dirty. The only likely risk is ticks, otherwise most kept animals are vetted for and kept clean. Because animal companions are a different species, there isn't a chance of getting pregnant, viruses and colds are usually too species specific, and human germs are far more dangerous to us then a canines germs.

For those who are worried about the welfare and rights of animals, we should look to the billions of meat and dairy animals that suffer systematic animal abuse and cruel methods of slaughter. Hunting of hundreds of thousands is allowed of almost every wild animal in the food chain (if they aren't already nearly extinct) and abandoned and unwanted domesticated animals die by the millions in shelters. Our focus should be on solving those problems instead of attacking a minority with an unpopular orientation.

Side: It should be legal
3 points

The only likely risk is ticks

That is not accurate. Many diseases exist in humans that are transmittable to animals and vice-versa.

(Most pathogens that cause human disease are transmitted by animals - ref)

viruses and colds are usually too species specific

That many viruses largely stay within a species is far from saying that they do not cross species boundaries.

"HIV/AIDS is the result of at least eleven cross-species transmission events of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) from non-human African primates to humans." ref

Some animals act as a reservoir for multiple viruses and can facilitate the emergence of new virus strains through gene reassortment. ref

see also

otherwise most kept animals are vetted for and kept clean.

I assume that you propose that the new law should restrict the allowed animals to "kept animals" then?

we should look to the billions of meat and dairy animals that suffer systematic animal abuse and cruel methods of slaughter.

Cruel methods of slaughter are illegal_, and people who eat meat generally assume that instances of cruelty are the exception rather than the rule and should be prosecuted.

There is evidence that humans might not have even become humans if early primates did not begin to incorporate meat into their diet. ref. While slow, the fact that we are reversing this long established practice is actually pretty remarkable.

Hunting of hundreds of thousands is allowed of almost every wild animal

See above + hunting would likely still be considered moral when it prevents overpopulation of a species. It should also be noted that hunters generally do not want prolonged suffering of the animal and a quick kill is in the hunter's best interest since it minimizes the tracking/retrieval process.

abandoned and unwanted domesticated animals die by the millions in shelters.

Millions are also rescued every year. This is less a result of intentional harm than a result of prioritization of resources.

-Our focus should be on solving those problems instead of attacking a minority with an unpopular orientation.

I hadn't heard that cracking down on zoophiles had become a top priority. Is that the case where you live?

Side: It should be illegal
goodmale(1457) Disputed
2 points

My pc will not let me write long arguments.

The disease go's the same with human on human.

It is not common viruses and cold cross, But it does happen.

Still if you make zoophilia illegal you need to do the same for everything else we do to animals.

It not all about humans view point.

It does not prevents overpopulation of a species. Because there is no overpopulation. And if anything we are making animals go bye bye!

No, Not where I live, It just the people make a big deal on this. But people think everything else we do to animals is ok, What hypocrites.

Side: It should be legal
2 points

The other argument commonly used is that animals can't communicate and thus can't consent to sex. Anyone with any level of experience and awareness of other species should know this is false. Most all the species in the animal kingdom have some forum of language, and some have even learned some of our own. Just in the day to day action of a pet owner interacting with a dog sees volumes of information communicated through body language, behaviors and vocalizations. It requires communication for a dog to let you know when its hungry, needs to go to the bathroom, or wants to play. Why would this apply to every other behavior and interaction with animals except for sex?

Side: It should be legal
2 points

Another claim is that bestiality is like pedophilia...this is completely false!!! Most people who are sexually attracted to animals are attracted to mature animals (the word “animal” includes both humans and non-humans). In other words, the vast majority of zoosexuals are attracted to mature animals who have reached adulthood. In this sense, zoosexuals have the same aversion to pedo-oriented sexuality that most people have.

Side: It should be legal
1 point

the comparison is not meant to say that every aspect is the same - only that there are several analogous elements:

degree of consent, sexual orientation, the anxiety created by the compulsion to do something illegal, etc.

Side: It should be illegal
2 points

I am fully aware that the idea of informed consent in legal circles is different and much stricter. I do not mean legal/informed consent when I say consent. No one who has a pet, no one who has partook in any animal derived products has ever had informed consent from any animals. It is an impossibility even for humans to give perfect informed consent because it presupposes that both parties are perfectly aware of the consequences of an action. Something that requires the ability to predict the future with 100% certainty.

In practice what is meant by informed consent is that one party discloses any information about the interaction which may reasonably be expected to affect the other’s decision. If one party does not have the information it cannot be given. If the other party is incapable of receiving the information it is not considered a requirement.

Side: It should be legal
1 point

For instance, you bring an unconscious stranger into a hospital, the doctor will still treat them on the presumption that they want to be healed. This is implied consent but cannot be informed consent.

The point is that informed consent, while an objective standard, relies on the context of the typical human mind and language. It loses applicability beyond the scope of the human race, attempting to apply it to morals involving non-humans leads to contradictions and absurdities.

If in the ‘eyes of the law’ no animal can ever consent then no animal has ever consented to another animal. That means every single sexual encounter in the whole of history before mankind was in fact rape. I consider the above a valid form of Reductio ad absurdum http://en.wikipedia.org...

Side: It should be legal
1 point

Finally I would like to point out that current legal precedence and tradition never tries to apply informed consent to animals. All anti-bestiality laws appear to be based on either religion or the concept of abuse. The law does not care about informed consent of animals.

Side: It should be legal
2 points

It not there choice. They have more feelings for animals then other people. I think there the best at understanding animals. Since there with animals all the time. I for one still think it sick. But it still love and caring with no harm. It better then all the other things we do to animals like chemical testing. DNA injecting, Farming of animals.

Side: It should be legal
0 points

It[sic] not there[sic] choice. They have more feelings for animals then[sic] other people.

That same argument could be made by pedophiles, correct?

Side: It should be illegal
2 points

People have been haveing sex with animals ever since we were born. We all came from animals are people forgetting that.

Zoophilia are not killers or rapist. There people that loves and cares about animals more then anybody else.

Pedophiles are different then Zoophilia. Pedophilia is the act or fantasy on the part of an adult of engaging in sexual activity with a child or children. A zoophilia is a person that loves and cares and respects animals but also has sex with adult animals.

Whats the difference between adult dogs and kids. You can also then ask your self what is the difference between kids and adults.

The difference is that adults are fully grown and there brain have developed completely and kids are still growing and learning.

Side: It should be legal
2 points

Love is love. My male is so happy fucking me. I will do anything for him.

Side: It should be legal
2 points

Making zoosexuality legal would hog tie haters who give threats of killing the zoosexual or their sexual non human partner or partner's. It would stop people from threating to burn your house down. It would stop violent pre flood type people from doing what they say to me and I am sure to many others.

Side: It should be legal
1 point

It wouldn't stop any of that at all. People wouldn't suddenly change their opinions on the matter.

Side: It should be illegal
2 points

People need to obey work out your own salvation with fear and trembling to not see God as fire refusing to terrorize the zoosexual or anyone else for that matter.

Side: It should be legal
2 points

Degrading, fear giving hate giving nothing that is good puts a burden on people that it is directed at them. We need to lift the burdens of others. God wants us to love others. Zoos are lovers. God wants us to love lovers. That is keeping bear one anothers burdens. To avoid symptoms for named ailments do this now:Upcspine or The specific chiropractic or Upper cervical heath centers. Two Good UCS only Chiropractors are Steven Duff is in Windsor California. Richard Duff is in San Francisco California.

Side: It should be legal
2 points

People need to stop pussy footing around letting zoosexuality be legal. It is up to the individual to be good whatever species. The law of man oppresses people. Sodomites did that. Read Isaiah 1 KJV Cambridge editon bible 1611.

Side: It should be legal
0 points

How about no.

Side: It should be illegal
1 point

The topic of bestiality has been a taboo in our society for a long time but the stigma behind it isn't justified. All the latest science suggest that the majority of mammals are intelligent individuals and can enjoy sex just as much as we do. Studies on zoophiles and zoosexuals have only shown that they are misunderstood, understudied, and are a diverse group that functions well in society without a problem.

There are several common misunderstandings and bad perceptions about the subject of bestiality. Sex with animals CAN be abusive and cruel, but the same can be said for all other forms of sex. Often, the only time it is reported on is in the rare instance of an animal abuser that is caught molesting and harming an animal. So the publics perception is that the act only happens in an abusive and criminal context, when on the contrary, their are many more zoophiles in the world (that the public doesn't know about) that love their animal partners deeply and put their animal companions needs first.

Side: It should be legal
0 points

I am sure many animals would not enjoy being raped by a human. If I picked up my cat, or one of my chickens right now and started shagging them I am sure they would find it unpleasant and would start crying out in distress.

Side: It should be illegal
thousandin1(1931) Clarified
3 points

Devil's Advocate: If you were to just pick up a human and start shagging them, I imagine they'd generally find it unpleasant as well. If you assume that there would be no equivalent of courting and/or foreplay in the case of animals but would be in the case of humans, you aren't making an apples to apples comparison.

Side: It should be illegal
goodmale(1457) Disputed
2 points

Having sex with a animal is not rape. And don't be stupid we are talking about animals that are a good size. Not a cat or chicken.

Side: It should be legal
goodmale(1457) Clarified
1 point

I don't care if you read this. I just was not done reading it my self I am going to have to read the rest tomorrow. I did not want to forget the link. So that why I posted it. I think you should read this, But you don't have to.

Side: It should be illegal
1 point

Humans are mammals. Female humans have mammary glands. Non human animals have mammary glands. Clothing covers the male parts giving the illusion that they are not an animal too. Thus the battle that now rages with one excuse after another against the zoo. Legal and illegal means we do not have freedom. Jesus came to give freedom. People need to keep God's law of work no ill to your neighbour. KJV Cambridge edition bible 1611 or 1900. Romans 13:10: Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love is the fulfilling of the law. Love the zoo.

Side: It should be legal
1 point

People are walking around in an unwalled prison with zoosexuality being illegal. People are not free. Jesus in us frees people. People are responsible to God for how they are. People talk about the bible never keeping it. People should not come down on a person like a falling brick wall when they see the many types or sexual interactions between species or their own. They need to keep, 1 Thessalonians 4:11 - And that ye study to be quiet, and to do your own business, and to work with your own hands, as we commanded you. Romans 13:10Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love is the fulfilling of the law.

Philippians 2:12 - 12 Wherefore, my beloved, as ye have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling.

Philippians 2:3 - Let nothing be done through strife or vainglory; but in lowliness of mind let each esteem other better than themselves. Proverbs 8:8 - All the words of my mouth are in righteousness; there is nothing froward or perverse in them. KJV Cambridge edition.1611 or 1900.

Luke 6:37Judge not, and ye shall not be judged: condemn not, and ye shall not be condemned: forgive, and ye shall be forgiven:

Side: It should be legal
1 point

Although there may be social reasons for ignoring and/or condemning zoosexuality, one reason for the taboo of zoophilia may be evolutionary; from a biological point of view, having sex with animals makes no sense because it doesn’t result in any offspring; consequently, the only humans that survived were humans that had sex with other humans, and because of this it became hard-wired into the DNA of their descendants (ultimately, most humans). This might explain why when someone is approached with the idea of zoosexuality, their initial reaction might be “eww, that’s gross” or “that’s perverted”. It’s because they’re not used to such “abnormal” ideas because society has told them it’s wrong and they are biologically programmed to do so. However, keep in mind that saying “that’s gross” is not a philosophical argument; it does not rely on any rational reasoning system to determine whether or not zoosexuality is moral. There are rational arguments that could be made for or against zoosexuality; for example, a utilitarian argument for zoosexuality is that it increases happiness so long as both parties are satisfied.

Side: It should be legal