should the U.S.A annex Canada
yes
Side Score: 6
|
no
Side Score: 5
|
|
|
|
1
point
|
2
points
Dude, when the USA is finally broken beyond any repair we're going to have to go to either Mexico or Canada. Leave Canada alone for our plan B. Anywhere you annex is going to get screwed up just as bad as the rest of the USA. Hey, annex Mexico. Then we get all that cheap labor, the Wall can be at the tip of Mexico where it's much smaller and easier to build, and all the drug money will actually become part of the US economy instead of an export of our profits. Side: no
If I recall correctly from history class, and I'm pretty sure I do.....Canada fought with the US for control of Michigan and some other territory, I believe that was the French and Indian war where the French who controlled Canada had Indian allies fighting with them against the states. Canada established it's boundaries by proving it was able to maintain sovereignty and made peace with the US. There is no reason for the US to annex Canada, they don't want to be ruled by us and why should they be? Sure, they ride under the umbrella of US military might but they don't need our support, they are a friend and not an enemy, and there's no reason why the US should try to take them over. Now Mexico is another story........it would be costly but those banditos are such a mess it would be good for the US to go down there, destroy the drug cartels and their plantations and get them to be real farmers producing real food to build a real economy based on work and production rather than drugs and organized crime. That would secure our south which is now much too inviting for invaders to infest like bed bugs being spread by drug cartels. It shouldn't take but 40,000 well equipped troops to blitzkrieg Mexico and enforce martial law while we put things in order there......plus a few ships on both sides of the country to shut out infiltration of enemies, weapons, or contraban. The southern border of Mexico is much smaller and needs to be closed off. Side: no
1
point
|