we shall ban mixed races from reproducing
I was walking through the city today when I saw many couples of mixed-races. Mostly caucasian males with asian whores. 'Oh, what a traitor of their country.' was what I thought. Those men, leaving their country's women and not making child of true heritage. And the men of the women's country, they wouldn't have any woman! Their children wouldn't even have proper nationality and home!
Those asian women only rely on Caucasian men for money, and thus, the children is what I hate the most, arrogant pricks. The woman is a whore, dressing like a prostitute.
Believe me, I've got a lot of experience dealing with these mongrels.
This belief shall be established not only in my country but globally. I do not believe in racism, and I think that races a're all equal and have unique cultures, but what I dislike is the fact that cultures and races are merging into one another, making them lose their uniqueness.
We shall globally make the affirmation "We shall fight as one united being with our country!"
for
Side Score: 17
|
 |
against
Side Score: 17
|
|
|
|
|
1
point
I'm against it simply because I believe all people are hateful pigs. I'd rather not deal with the constant harassment/focus on race that would be directed on me and my family. I've dibble dabbled outside of my race, but would never marry or procreate with anyone outside of it...not because I'm racist but because so much of this world is. Side: for
|
0
points
I accept this debate and shall take the position that we should not ban mixed-race marriages nor prohibit them from reproducing. I'll begin this round by replying to my opponent's opening. "Mostly caucasian males with asian whores." This is a baseless assertion against Asian women. You also need to provide data that the majority of mixed race marriages are of this sort for it to have some relevance. "'Oh, what a traitor of their country.' was what I thought. Those men, leaving their country's women and not making child of true heritage." Why are they traitors? And what value is there to having "true heritage"? "And the men of the women's country, they wouldn't have any woman! Their children wouldn't even have proper nationality and home!" This assertion isn't backed with anything. "Those asian women only rely on Caucasian men for money, and thus, the children is what I hate the most, arrogant pricks. The woman is a whore, dressing like a prostitute." Once again this is a baseless assertion requiring some evidence. It also needs to be given context related to the resolution. "Believe me, I've got a lot of experience dealing with these mongrels." My opponent's possible prejudice aside, what he has "dealt with" has nothing to do with properly substantiating the resolution. "This belief shall be established not only in my country but globally." We'll need to hear at least one good reason and some evidence backing it up to consider the resolution. Especially if it's to be considered on a global level. "I do not believe in racism, and I think that races a're all equal and have unique cultures, but what I dislike is the fact that cultures and races are merging into one another, making them lose their uniqueness." What is wrong with races and cultures merging? And what value is there in the uniqueness of cultures? While there may be a good answer to this, please relate it to the resolution. To what extent and for what reason is the "uniqueness of culture" so valuable that we should prevent all mixed-race marriages? "We shall globally make the affirmation "We shall fight as one united being with our country!"" I'm not sure what this means and how it applies to the resolution. So far my opponent hasn't stated anything to support the resolution. I look forward to seeing my opponent make an argument in favor of banning mixed-race marriages and to him replying to my responses. I'd like to thank my opponent for this debate and anyone who reads it. Side: against
0
points
Pro You may have pointed out some of the flaws I had made, but it seems that you do not have a strong conviction to support mixed races, you are just someone with a neutral will. I do not see any benefits being made from mixed races. No matter which races are merged in, they are inferior due to the fact they lack loyalty in their country. These men are from First-world countries, therefore they go overseas to work. If these men have opportunities to work overseas, that means that they are both rich and on a prominent position. Do you want these good men to make children with women that does not have value in position or occupation? The child is not going to belong in the fatherland that has provided all for him/her. Populations of first-world countries are decreasing due to the fact that men go overseas without making children with his own people. Everybody loves these children just because of how they were born. They are likely to escape unemployment, because many people are wanting to hire them for their education, talent, and so on. This makes the people born in unfortunate circumstances hard to find jobs. Thus the children of these people are in such fortunate state that they can evade military service and poverty. Think of all the soldiers that fought for their country. Do these children have the same loyalty as they do? Report this Argument Side: for
0
points
I'd like to thank my opponent for his response. I will now reply to his second round. My opponent begins his round: "You may have pointed out some of the flaws I had made, but it seems that you do not have a strong conviction to support mixed races, you are just someone with a neutral will." I'm not the one attempting to affirm a resolution here, you are, so my position on the matter is irrelevant. I do not need to prove mixed race couples are beneficial, I simply need to show that your arguments fail to affirm the resolution. I can take a neutral position (even if it's against what I personally believe) and still do so. "I do not see any benefits being made from mixed races. No matter which races are merged in, they are inferior due to the fact they lack loyalty in their country." Firstly, the resolution seeks to deny the ability for mixed race marriages, therefore it is incumbent upon my opponent to show why these marriages are harmful, not why the alternative is beneficial. Secondly, my opponent needs to show why they are inferior in any way, and why loyalty to country matters and how being in a mixed race marriage in any way shows one is not loyal to their country. Furthermore, for example, the United States is not a "white people" country. It is a country of more than one ethnicity. One could certainly marry outside of whatever their ethnicity is, and still be extremely loyal to their country. This is true of any other country as well. "These men are from First-world countries, therefore they go overseas to work." Who are these men? What exactly are you talking about here? And why does it matter? "If these men have opportunities to work overseas, that means that they are both rich and on a prominent position." Once again, how does this pertain to the resolution? "Do you want these good men to make children with women that does not have value in position or occupation?" Why not? "The child is not going to belong in the fatherland that has provided all for him/her." The child will belong to whatever country he/she was born in, if one can say that a child "belongs" to any country at all. "Populations of first-world countries are decreasing due to the fact that men go overseas without making children with his own people." We'll need to see some data, otherwise this is just a random assertion that doesn't back up the resolution. Even if we assume this is true, it doesn't necessarily advance the resolution regardless. "Everybody loves these children just because of how they were born. They are likely to escape unemployment, because many people are wanting to hire them for their education, talent, and so on." We'll need to see some data for this assertion to be backed up and relevant to the resolution. "This makes the people born in unfortunate circumstances hard to find jobs." Being a child of a mixed race couple does not make it inherently more difficult for one to find a job. Provide some data on this please. "Thus the children of these people are in such fortunate state that they can evade military service and poverty." I'm not sure how this follows the assertion just before it, but it certainly doesn't advance the resolution. "Think of all the soldiers that fought for their country. Do these children have the same loyalty as they do?" Why wouldn't they? Ethnicity/race is not the same as nationality. Because one is of mixed ethnicity does not mean they wouldn't have the same sense of national pride as anyone else. Even if they didn't, it still wouldn't justify banning mixed-race marriages on a local or global scale. My opponent has the burden of proof in this debate to show that we should ban mixed-race marriages and to provide good justifications for doing so. So far he has not done that, he asserts that mixed race children will be unemployed and will not be loyal to their country without providing any evidence for this. I will conclude my round here and I look forward to my opponent's final round. Side: against
0
points
dragon4210 has messaged me privately. My opponent has unfortunately forfeited his last round and also failed to prove that we should ban "Mixed-race marriages and prohibit them from reproducing." My opponent needed to give reasonable reasons and explanation for why we should ban these types of marriages, instead he gave some personal reasons that failed to back up the resolution sufficiently. With the burden of proof on my opponent, he failed to prove the resolution and thus loses the debate. I'd like to thank my opponent and anyone who read this debate. Side: against
What a load of bollocks, typical far right, racist propaganda with the laughable but I'm not racist tag added!! Out of interest Dragon where are you from that is so ethnically pure? As I don't know of one country in the world that is ethnically pure for instance I'm English and proud of it but we are a mongrel breed because we're a country that has been invaded so many times, I'm proud of my mongrel heritage, if it wasn't for mixed race marriages and breeding I wouldn't be the man I am today (I'm of Norman-Irish ancestry), so I don't see a problem. Side: against
0
points
0
points
|
