CreateDebate


What is this?

This is a collection of graphs and information about the debate. For clarity, only the top three positions (tags) are presented in graphs.

Language Grade Level uses the Flesh-Kincaid Readability Grade Level formula.

Debate Statistics for Reductionists/Materialists: Is Solidness an Illusion?
view debate

Side scores:
 
Yes, it is. : 1

 
No, it is not. : 2

Total arguments:
 
Yes, it is. : 1

 
No, it is not. : 1

Word lengths:
 
Yes, it is. : 4.4 ave

 
No, it is not. : 4.54 ave



Language grade level:
Flesh-Kincaid Readability Grade Level
 
Yes, it is. : 10th

 
No, it is not. : 11th

Vocabulary overlap:
 
Yes, it is.

 
No, it is not.

Total words used:
 
Yes, it is. : 48

 
No, it is not. : 178



Word frequencies:
affect  also  atom  atoms  aware  being  believe  between  bondso  called  comes  concrete  considered  counterintuitivehope  covalent  create  creating  effect  electrons  events  feel  force  forces  head  helps  holds  illusion  indeed  itself  linked  matter  nucleus  outer  particles  put  shells  solidness  solidnessand  solidno  somewhat  sure  swapping  think  through  together  try  usually  utterly  wallthe  ways