CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS 1122331

Reward Points:16
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
91%
Arguments:8
Debates:2
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
8 most recent arguments.
1 point

Israel wouldnt of gone in, but of course the Palestinians continued firing rockets day in day out. Any other country in the world, if they had one missle fired at them, would be at war, Israel has hundreds of missles fired at them, and they cant do anything? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mbhc9ob4MNs&feature;=channel_page

1 point

No disrespect but l would disagree because people are talking about how to prevent a future shooting. I'm sure the families are okay with that.

1 point

I think it depends on the situation. If there is a shooting and someone pushes for gun control because of it than I'd say they were just using it as an example. Nothing wrong with that. However if you use the same shooting to criticize an opposite party than that isn't right. Not to insult the GOP but when Romney used the Libya attack to criticize Obama that was wrong. But when Obama used the Auora shooting as a reason for gun control that was okay in my book. This is only because in the first example, the push was for politics. In the second example the push was for a resolution for a problem. Again no disrespect for the GOP

1122331(16) Clarified
1 point

Sorry that may have sounded too opinion based. I meant that the USA and Israel wouldn't attack Iran because they wouldn't want Americans and Israelis being killed in the Iran retaliation. Iran on the other hand would attack without as much worry of retaliation. To summarize the USA and Israel have more inhibitions than Iran.

1 point

Israel only fought Gaza because Gaza started it. Only about 20 people from Gaza died. Millions of Jews were killed in the holocaust for no reason.

2 points

Yes but Iran doesn't care about their people so they will be fine with bombing a country. The US and Israel though are nicer and wouldn't act unless it needed to

2 points

That is not true. The Democrats come from working middle class and poor families that had to work for their money. If you're republican you're either rich or you are from the middle of Kansas where your parents taught you crap about why you should hate everyone

0 points

Although the democrats have a plan that on the outside may require more taxes, they only raise taxes on the rich so they can use the money to help people that need it. Also, the Republican Party has rich and upper middle class people. The Democratic Party has rich middle class and poor people. That itself says a lot.

Displaying 2 most recent debates.

Tied Positions: Someone who sticks with it vs. Moderate Compromiser

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here