CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic


Enemies
View All
pic


Hostiles
View All
pic


RSS 11wolf

Reward Points:679
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
96%
Arguments:341
Debates:111
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
1 point

As it seems to the title you have made to this particular debate seems to suggest otherwise. If you truly think that teachers gives too much homework then you should be able to use proper grammar when creating this title. Therefore on this one and only point means that they don't give it enough to students to where they fully understand and learn what was taught. Which leaves me to say good day to you sir.

give too much homework

1 point

For one we have the right to bear arms even if that is just one. Next is just because if they ban guns that wont mean that everyone will listen. If one person has a gun and lets say he went in and broke into a home (just make a scenario) what is there to stop that one person? They don't have a gun but the offender does. Where is the protection that was promised? What is there to stop the person from killing the other? There is absolutely nothing they can do. This could go over and over then next thing you know the crime rate is higher than ever. This will cause more problems than it would for people to keep guns, it will just end up worse than it was and they will make a more urgent matter to take care of.

1 point

Really if you think of it in the U.S most people will vote for their party. They don't really think of the person they are fully voting for. Then there is also that people don't really vote for themselves, since there are so many people out there in a country we have representatives which is also on the case of their own political party. For example Kentucky is an republican state, there is more republicans than democrat so therefore Kentucky will most likely go for the republican candidate. There is really no such think as people fully voting half of people don't even know who their own representative is, they just look at their political party. So on this account even if you did that it would not make much of a difference.

11wolf(679) Clarified
1 point

This may be true but there is the problem of numbers. They may be slow and not that smart and not very deadly all alone but once in a group they could easily get you. In numbers they will easily get you before you could kill them all.

11wolf(679) Clarified
1 point

By using the katana as a zombie killing weapon to be good you would have to be really trained with that since that certain sword is a slashing sword and no a stabbing sword. you would need a lot of flexibility to keep slashing that sword with as much power to keep attacking at some zombies in a close range without getting infected would be pretty hard if you could not move swiftly and effectively.

1 point

It all depends on your outlook on all of this, this can be possible though. For one with all of these experiments that people have been doing it could easily do some kind of human experiment for like living longer or something like that, which would go terribly wrong and can easily infect another. There is also a point to where all this pollution in the world could somehow make a disease that could kill people and they could easily come back. So in this case it could easily spread and with a bite it would be even worse. What would I do is such a common question and is simple. You will need some things which would be food,clean water,shelter hopefully something sturdy, and of course protection. Everyone will be going to these big places so go to a smaller less popular store or what ever and get your supplies. Protection you will need more than guns, yes they are good but they need ammo and won't last forever, so some hand held weapon that is good in close range. Also it will be smart to set in a less populated place and most people say save yourself and don't worry about others, but you do need some people to help you the more people the better. You cant have too much though yes numbers are good but it can be bad. One main thing you want is to be fit otherwise you will be dead quick. The last thing is don't be stupid if you do stupid mistakes you will also be dead. Have no attachments, don't trust anyone even if they are your friends and family, make sure when you kill you kill with a swift movement and try not to make noise. If you can be smart and be cautious then you will live to see another day, and if they do get you fight to the end otherwise you would have died for nothing. (I'm kinda a nerd,geek and gamer so I have no life)

1 point

It all depends on your outlook on all of this, this can be possible though. For one with all of these experiments that people have been doing it could easily do some kind of human experiment for like living longer or something like that, which would go terribly wrong and can easily infect another. There is also a point to where all this pollution in the world could somehow make a disease that could kill people and they could easily come back.

1 point

Who said that they haven't already, with what are people hiding. Also there is the point where we have no idea what one might look like, it could be right before our eyes and we might never have realized it. There are many galaxies out there and yet we haven't even accomplished to get out of our own galaxy. there still might be a chance to were some kind of life is out of our galaxy and they or them or it whatever you want to say cant even get into ours. There is so many possibilities of this and we have hardly any knowledge. At first we believed that the world was flat,that Earth was the only planet and later were proven wrong, couldn't that mean we are wrong about this?

11wolf(679) Clarified
1 point

I didn't proof read it this time. i probably should have and yet i'm still in honors english.

1 point

This could really go both ways it all depends on who you are or in this case the "leader" is and where you are. There is no real way to decide whether leaders are born or made, but there are points you can make to win a side or not. First off it could be inherited power of leadership which would state they were born to be a leader. then there is the whole dominant genes that could make a person feel like or just take it easier to lead someone while others may be born to watch, follow and so forth.

Displaying 10 most recent debates.

Winning Position: fewer restriction
Tied Positions: No it's not real vs. Yes it can be
Winning Position: Church of the flying spaghetti monster!?
Winning Position: John Lock
Winning Position: direct democracy

About Me


"Im an ok person I love to make new friends I hardly use jokes im a serious person"

Biographical Information
Name: Brandon LeClair
Gender: Male
Age: 21
Marital Status: Single
Political Party: Other
Country: United States
Religion: Wiccan
Education: High School

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here