Smoking is a certain damage on people's health. It causes many health issues, the most spread of which is lung cancer, the reason of thousands of people's death. Yes, the fact of its unusefulness to the human body is not even debatable.

However, when it comes to the ban of smoking at all, it takes more than just an argument of health issue. In my opinion, the question of human rights outweighs the previous one. Why should some be boarded on their rights because others want it? it is up to other people if they don't want to smoke, but making other people banned on their habits is not right. Everyone should be responsible for their actions only, and stay out of somebody else's business. After all, if smokers would get negative consequences on their health, they should accept it, because they take responsibility for their decisions. And if people decide to smoke, so be it. People should respect each others' decisions, no matter how risky it can be.

The most succesful and more economically developed countries run democracy as a type of government. Even those that are not oficially in democracy, practically are. Most of them. Let's take Italy as an example. If digging deep in the parliament, we can see that the structure of governance, an official one - is republic. However, in my opinion, democracy is rather an ideology of the whole nation than of the government only. So the part of an official type of governance is rebuplican, but democracy owns an ideology of the country.

Despite the fact, that i stand for the democracy, i'm not taking into account all the forms of it. I only support liberal democracy. The most perfect, fair and the purest as in my opinion. So if country runs democracy, it is good. But if it is a liberal democracy, it is perfect.