CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS 22021073

Reward Points:2
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
100%
Arguments:2
Debates:0
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
2 most recent arguments.
1 point

I believe that in order to keep chaos under control, it is necessary to live under a government. Without it, there would be neither a military nor a police force to protect the citizens. At best, people could band together to protect their friends/family, but that would do no good against possible external threats from other countries. On a similar topic, the U.S. would basically be eliminated from the global market since businesses would shut down shortly after the government was removed. People along waterways or with access to airplanes could feasibly continue to import and export goods, but the majority of the country wouldn't have that luxury. It would be up to these independent people to continue trading. Finally, without a government, medical care would be hard to come across. General medical facilities as well as research centers wouldn't have the funding to be able to continue their work. People with terminal illnesses couldn't be treated and would die as a result. Those with auditory, visual, or mobile impairments might not have access to tools they need to function (i.e. glasses, wheelchairs, crutches, hearing aids, etc). Due to less of the population being able to get vaccinated, the lowered herd immunity could cause multiple viral outbreaks as well.

1 point

I disagree that life without a government would be less stressful. For starters, you would have to worry more about your basic needs. Without people working, you couldn't just go to the grocery store whenever you needed more food. Instead, you would have to focus your time, energy, and resources into hunting, gathering, farming, etc. Not to mention, you would have to hope that you are or know someone who is handy that could help you build and repair your supplies/house.

And while I do agree that there would be more free will, I don't believe that the crime rate would drop. If there is nobody to enforce the law, what's stopping you from breaking it? (Consider what happens in 'The Purge' movies when everything becomes legal.) It would almost be necessary to steal on a daily basis in order to survive since, as I mentioned above, no one would be producing goods anymore.

22021073 has not yet created any debates.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here