the problem with NO/means testing is that people that can afford to pay are wealthier, and will have actually paid more into the system than someone that is 'poore

no i feel that they have paid their tax therefore we as a society should look after them

no they have paid enough throughout their life already. i don't think everyone be able to pay.

no - some people can get to a very old age with very little health problems. whereas some people unfortunately suffer for most of their life - if this is something that was to be implemented, they should review this on a case by case basis, and reviewing how much to charge each person... however we pay taxes almost our entire lift into supporting our NHS etc so there should be no need to make this payment once we reach a certain age

no because we put enough in to the system through our contributions, so we should get something back

no, not everyone can afford that, financial circumstances need to be considered

No - Taking away their choice, however it could be putting patients a risk so maybe an alternative compromise

people have the right to their own choices and can't be forced, and have their own opinion as to whether it works in the first place.

I would no has everyone should be given a choice and their would not be given one

no - some people maybe against vaccinations (not that im anti vax!!) but i agree it should be their choice. it shouldn't stop them doing their job which they have trained for for so long... they could be allergic to the ingredients or had a previous adverse affect from the vaccination and shouldn#t be penalized for something they cant control... other measures should be considered instead