CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Identify Ally
Declare Enemy
Challenge to a Debate
Report This User

Allies
View All
pic


Enemies
View All
pic
pic


Hostiles
View All
None

RSS AThAPhys

Reward Points:54
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
96%
Arguments:65
Debates:0
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
1 point

Maybe, I suppose that I haven't disproved God, but that I have disproved the Christian God.

Call me cynical, but how does that disprove God?

The Bible says: In the beginning there was nothing. Then God created...

Matter cannot be created or destroyed.

1 point

Because not everyone believes in God's law, and some people have different gods, with different laws... just because you believe in a certain God, that doesn't mean everyone else does...

1 point

You are using the argument from ignorance: "We don't yet understand how everything in the world came to be, so a bearded omnipotent deity must have done it."

We don't have to explain practically everything yet. I use science to make sense of the world, and it doesn't matter that science doesn't know everything, because what science does know is true and holds up to the test of investigation.

1 point

There is no evidence for Genesis. There is evidence for the Big Bang. I find it really hard to believe that in the beginning, there was nothing, and then suddenly God appeared, and made some light (even though energy cannot be created or destroyed, and light it a type of energy)... it just doesn't make any sense. And just because it isn't how you picture things doesn't mean it is true.

1 point

In my debates, I like to prove that God cannot exist, rather than does not exist. So here is some proof.

1. God violates the laws of physics. Remember in the beginning of most holy books, like the Bible, when God creates the heavens and the earth?

Well, look at this law of physics:

No matter or energy can be created or destroyed.

And there you have it! Proof that God does not exist.

Here's another:

The Bible says that God is omnipotent. Omnipotence is impossible, because in order to be truly omnipotent, God would be able to create a rock so large that even he cannot lift it. But then he is not omnipotent, if he cannot lift the rock. And if he can't create the rock, he is not omnipotent.

I just proved that god does not exist

1 point

Paedophilia harms no-one unless it is acted upon.

That's true.

Expecting people not to act on their sexuality though is of course unrealistic.

But now we're back to square one: paedophilia is harmful. This path of reasoning changes nothing.

My point was only that we shouldn't really have opposite attitudes to essentially what is the same issue: abnormal sexual attraction.

I think we can, considering that gayness harms no one, while paedophilia does cause harm to children.

1 point

Your point is a good once, but the difference is that gayness harms no one, while paedophilia harms children as they are not sexually mature.

1 point

Then I would suggest you go to different site because unfortunately there is a lot of swearing here.

1 point

There is no evidence for the Bible. I think the world came from the Big Bang. Also, slavery is talked about in the bible. That is not happening today.

0 points

Why should a 2,000 year old book with no evidence to back it up be a consideration in decisions about transgenderism?

AThAPhys has not yet created any debates.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here