Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.

Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.

Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!

Identify Ally
Declare Enemy
Challenge to a Debate
Report This User

View All

View All

View All

RSS Again

Reward Points:166
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
Efficiency Monitor

10 most recent arguments.
1 point


So why would anybody want to read anything further you have to say? Your title practically screams that you want attention. You're a baby crying for his mommy. Only instead of sound you are using hate.

1 point

You didn't read the description

Are you kidding me? The title of your "debate" is a blanket statement that socialists need to be ethnically cleansed. It's such a childish, desperate plea for attention and conflict that nobody is going to read any "description" you care to write because you are an obvious, clear-cut, textbook shitposter.

1 point

Ratting out competition to the cops is a very effective strategy.

It's a very stupid strategy. Rats have a habit of disappearing.

1 point

I have spent the last three months pointing out how much of a piece of shit you are

And let me guess. It's "objective reality" that I'm a piece of shit. Right? Lol. Funny thing is, that's how psychopaths usually view their victims.

You're absolutely bonkers mate. You're not even worth replying to.

1 point

Shut up imbecile.

Ahahahaha! The irony here is absolutely laughable. You behave like a psychopath and then attack capitalists for having the exact same personality type. You've spent the last three months obsessively harassing me you mentally ill rodent. And you want to have a conversation about psychopathy? Lol.

The objective reality that most billionares are psychopaths is not your idea.

Well it damned well isn't yours mate. So the question remains. Why are you stealing other people's ideas?

In fact, forget that. Why are you arbitrarily determining your own baseless assertions to be "objective reality"? Have you personally employed a team of psychiatrists and successfully assessed every billionaire in the world for psychopathy? Have you then collected the results and conducted an impartial analysis, including identifying factors of bias?

You have done none of these things. You're simply an idiot and your arguments always boil down to the exact same thing: It's a fact because I say it is.

1 point

The worst multiaccounter ever

Better than being the worst human being ever, I guess. Bye.

Again(166) Clarified
1 point

That's not what I'm doing

Yes it is. It's either that or you are too stupid to understand the difference between acknowledging history and justifying it.

I'm not interested in your infantile, obsessive attempts to distort everything I write. Please, go away you goddamned child.

1 point

Same old games. I assume you are both of them and just want people to look at you.

He might be Ramshutu. He isn't Nom.

However, you've done a marvellous job of describing his obsessive thirst for attention. And you are absolutely right that he pretends to be other people. Only a few days ago he was replying to his own posts on different accounts.

The kid is honestly just pathetic.

1 point

Why does Ramshutu's waterfall sound just like Nom?

Mate, just leave while you still have a fraction of dignity left. You are extremely boring and stupid.

0 points

I believe that climate change is real and that man made carbon emissions is the primary reason. However, to argue that the OK glacier is shrinking is primarily because of cliamate change is morally wrong and deceptive.

I think the complete opposite is true. I think your source is wrong and deceptive. Here is my evidence:-

Overall, we rate the American Thinker, Questionable based on extreme right wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories/pseudoscience, use of poor sources and failed fact checks.

According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, American Thinker has published Anti-LGBT articles, as well as those by prominent white nationalist, Jared Taylor. Further, American Thinker routinely publishes conspiracy theories, such as those by Pamela Geller, who is also on the SPLC’s hate watch list due to anti-Islam positions: Report: Obama said ‘I Am a Muslim’, which has been debunked as a false claim. They have also promoted conspiracies about the Seth Rich Murder and they have published numerous articles that are not supportive of the consensus of science, such as this one: The Hoax of ‘Climate Change’

About Me

I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here