CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS AirmanEpic

Reward Points:12
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
100%
Arguments:7
Debates:1
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
7 most recent arguments.
1 point

This is a hypothetical scenario.

But no. They did a rape kit, but all a rape kit can determine is if sexual contact occured (cuts on the vagina can happen regardless). There were no bruises or lacerations indicating he hit or beat her.

Supporting Evidence: Rape kit usage (en.wikipedia.org)
1 point

Hahahaha this is silly. There is no need for evidence, no need for justification. Evolution is a simple concept. All these statements are FACTS. Roll with me here. Do you agree that:

1: All plants, animals, and everything else are different in small, but quantifiable ways (She's got blue eyes, he's got brown hair, etc)

2: some of these traits, for example blue hair, might make an individual in a species more likely to be seen than, say, someone with brown hair.

3: being seen easily means that individual is a target for predators.

4: Many traits can be passed on, for example brown hair.

5: if the blue-haired individual is eaten he can't reproduce.

There, you agree! It's simple. If you get eaten you can't have sex. If you can't have sex, you don't pass on what makes you you to your children. Your children, and their children, will be put through the exact same trials. Eventually, this creates a change in the group, as the more successful group overpowers the group that can't reproduce at the same rate. It's fairly simple.

1 point

Killing someone makes you a murderer. I don't advocate your view in the slightest. However, if you'd gotten a group of your friends and beat the living daylights out of him I would give you applause and help hold him down while you beat the shit out of him.

I cannot say I've been in your situation, and I don't know what would happen if I was in it. However, you are still alive. Rejoice in this. If you went out and killed this man, you've just taken a life. That doesn't fix your "used" status. All that did is kill one potentially redeemable person.

Besides, when he's dead, it's no fun to beat him up.

Lastly, you have my pity, my thirst for justice, and of course, a heartfelt offer of friendship. You'd have to be a shitty person to view someone differently because of something they had no control over. I understand it if you don't trust me or anyone else, but you don't seem to a bad person at all, and you're doing the world a disservice by hiding in your room.

1 point

Emerge? Like, appear on the face of the planet, ready to rape their first victim? Or grow from the ground? No. They're born and raised, and something causes them to want to commit rape. Instead of killing them, I suggest punishing them in attempt to correct their problem, and then trying to correct whatever caused them to be raised in that way.

1 point

Holy shit! Did you know that 1 in 3 college males says they would commit rape if they could get away with it. I know this is disgusting and criminal, but can you really condemn 33% of all college men to DEATH? I'd much rather find an effective way to help them realize how wrong this is. People who commit crimes deserve to be jailed should be jailed according to their crimes. If rape alone is the crime, then they should be jailed for it. Surely KILLING someone should never be acceptable unless they actually committed murder?

AirmanEpic(12) Clarified
1 point

They "talked about it". He said "I confess I really want to do blah blah blah." and she said "oh that sounds interesting" and so on.

Also, it was brought up in our parallel discussion that sex with someone who doesn't expressedly give consent is rape. Especially if it's difficult for her to refuse or resist.

I happen to be of the opinion that if she disapproves, she has sort of a DUTY to state as much. How is he supposed to know otherwise?

1 point

That simply isn't true at all! If everything led to a never ending cycle, everyone would be at war with everyone else, every insult would lead to never ending fights that would never end even with the death of the assailants, and so on. Eventually, both parties get tired of fighting, and the combatant who came out on top decides what happens from there.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here