CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
pic


Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic


RSS Amarel

Reward Points:5565
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
85%
Arguments:9473
Debates:164
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
Amarel(5565) Clarified
1 point

You wouldn't call the cops who hide in the hallway but you fully believe that most cops will hide in the hallway. You'll need that special 911 for hero cops, rather than that 911 for the regular ones.

No mass shooter was ever stopped by anyone who was without a gun.

Amarel(5565) Clarified
1 point

You're witnessing a mass shooting and you're not calling the cops. Ok. What are you doing then?

Amarel(5565) Clarified
1 point

It's not possible. Not only because of the size of the country and number of guns, but because people don't want what you want.

1 point

In the end, the bad guy was shot and killed by someone who is apparently not a good guy with a gun.

Amarel(5565) Clarified
1 point

Magical thinking. Broad disarmament is not a possibility in the US. Legal issues aside, there are far too many in a country far too big. Instead of pipe dreams, we should consider real solutions given the physical, legal, and social realities on the ground.

1 point

Your post showed in my alerts as a response to my post pointing out to lipek that most police officers are not Democrats, as was asserted. To that post, yours appeared irrelevant and needlessly insulting. Could be my mistake.

1 point

Not partisan, so that's half true.

The quality and relevance of your responses has really declined since I've been away.

1 point

Black poverty rates were declining despite Jim Crow which, incidentally, ended generations ago.

Amarel(5565) Clarified
1 point

I'm sure you believe that. But it was the Great Society and other such measures that have held black and poor people in poverty for generations.

Amarel(5565) Clarified
1 point

The problem is that you don't believe they CAN overcome their past. You favor policies that hold poor people in their impoverished state while you claim they need more from the nanny state that holds them down. That's the old paternalism of the slave days reinvented by modern Democrats. Those lower expectations are based on race. There's a word for that.

About Me


Biographical Information
Gender: Male
Marital Status: Single
Political Party: Other
Country: United States
Education: College Grad

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here