CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS AuntChilada

Reward Points:2
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
100%
Arguments:6
Debates:0
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
6 most recent arguments.
1 point

Iran does not have a legitimate democracy. The elected leaders barely have any power and they don't make a difference. It doesn't matter how democratic the younger population is. Iran also has a high rate of unemployment among the younger population, meaning that none of the money that would come from a lifting of sanctions would go to the democrats you want to support anyways. All of the money is set up to fund the theocracy by going straight to bonyads. If anything, this younger generation is going to see that the lifting of sanctions didn't do anything for them, making them just as likely to turn against it.

1 point

If we lift sanctions against Iran, they are going to gain economic independence that makes our economy irrelevant. The new influx of money won't go to the people, it will go straight to the bonyads, who will send the money to the revolutionary guard, who supports the violent Bajis, that even beat up their own dissident citizens...You should get the point.

What "diplomacy" brought the "pressure" down? Amadinejad was firmly against the nuclear deal, yet he was elected by the Iranian government while Obama was enacting "diplomacy."

The point is, it doesn't matter how suicidal they are or are not. They won't give the money back to their people. They never have and their theocracy is not set up to allow it. They have a strong system in place to manipulate the people through their religion, and it is dangerous to allow them the independence and chance to create their own nuclear weapons program. The theocracy is power hungry and it always had been. If they proved themselves to be a civilized democracy, the situation would be different. That isn't the case yet.

2 points

Iran does not have a civilized democracy. The Islamic theocracy has a long history of allowing terrorist groups to flourish. Needless to say based on recent historical events, Iran is not the most consistent or honest country. If they get the economic backing to continue their nuclear weapons program on their own, they won't care what the US is giving them. Once they gain independence, they will just continue to ensure permanent power for themselves through their nuclear weapons program. Citizens don't actually get any of the money, their economy is set up to send money to bonyands, not to give it back to the people. The revolutionary guard is not the people, they are the extremists that fund terrorists organizations like the bajis.

2 points

Why would they need to have a flourishing economy? Building nuclear weapons is expensive. Iran does not have a legitimate democracy; they cannot be trusted with a flourishing economy. Unless Iran establishes a civilized system of government, they cannot be trusted not to use their revenue to build nuclear weapons. Iran is a power-hungry regime, and the first thing they would do with the revenue from sanction removal, historically, will not be to give it to the people, it will be to invest in devastating nuclear power.

3 points

10 years is a lot of time for Iran to build a significant economic standing. Right now, we have leverage to pressure them because the are desperate. When they can no longer withstand the pressure, they will give in on their own accord, without being rewarded. The only way to keep the Islamic Extremists at bay is to continue to assert maximum pressure. The last thing we need is for them to be able to stockpile money.

3 points

Iran cannot be reasoned with, they do not have a legitimate democracy. In order to stop their nuclear advancement, we have to show them that we mean business. As an actual democracy with serious military and economic standing, Iran will listen to us if we are aggressive enough. Iran does not have a good history of being good at diplomacy, so we need to speak their language and assert maximum pressure from a direct economic standpoint and implied military standpoint. We don't need to be reminded about how well they negotiated with us during the Iranian hostage crisis...

AuntChilada has not yet created any debates.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here