Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 2 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
Arguments: | 2 |
Debates: | 0 |
But cloning is different from artificial insemiantion in that cloning makes a exact copy of a person with the same genes and artifical insemination is taking genes from two parents and putting it into an egg. Also, since cloning has such a high failure rate, then it may not be good to get a baby that has deformities from cloning.
Cloning is currently a very imprecise science at this point with only 1 or 2 successful occurrences out of 100. We often argue on the merits of a human life in regards to abortion and that it is cruel, but with cloning we make a life that is often deformed and doomed to die, which many clones do die from infections and unknown causes. Too much cloning would also eliminate natural variation in nature because it would be the same genes being spread around and defying nature. Is it right to farm organs and such for our own profit if it means having to test, and fail greatly, in order to advance the cloning science? Probably not.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |