- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
That's exactly what you were doing.
Exactly how was I comparing gays to "incest people"?
The "sexual rights narrative" is identical because sexual rights IS the narrative.
Now which one of us is the sophist dope? You're proving a point which I never contested in the first place.
My point is that basing marriage equality on sexual rights would be a disaster, because it would lead to a permanent "human rights" battle over the definition of marriage.
I wish you were smart enough to know when to shut your stupid mouth.
I would rather shut yours.
You several times said the legalization of same sex marriage would include the right to incest
I never oncer said it. Gay marriage is already legalized in the US, through a Supreme Court decision.
I was talking about a formal definition of marriage in a possible marriage equality law. It's no wonder Congress hasn't even discussed a law like that. Becasue however you define marriage equality, it would open a can of worms.