Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 3 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
Arguments: | 3 |
Debates: | 0 |
North Korea is run by a leader who is power obsessed and all about his ego. He will eventually bomb someone to prove a point and basically show the world "Hey North Korea is here and we can bomb people too". Why not go ahead and bomb their sources of the bomb and the country to go ahead and stop a problem before it starts. Kim Jong Un may not be all talk and we shouldn't wait until it's too late.
Aaleeyah 3
option 3 seems like the best option because it possibly eliminate a world war due to unwillingness to communicate between the two countries. Putting a halt to the nuclear program in Korea by the US agreeing not to undermine the government would add trust between the countries.
Bricen Rivers (1)
I think we should do a preemptive attack because if you blow up their main resources and plants that make the nuclear weapons, with that being uranium and plutonium, we disable their ability to even consider a nuclear attack on anyone an option because we have destroid their source of even making the weapons.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |