- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
So if they are earning without obviously any malpractice, there is nothing wrong in that.
Here's something wrong with that.
Being greedy, shallow and motivated by money is not compatible with being caring, altruistic and kind. The latter are characteristics which are desirable in someone responsible for your health. The former are not characteristics which are desirable in someone responsible for your health.
Bible has never commanded to kill.
Then obviously you have never read it. Here are a couple of examples out of hundreds:-
A man or a woman who acts as a medium or fortuneteller shall be put to death by stoning; they have no one but themselves to blame for their death. (Leviticus 20:27 NAB)
Whoever strikes his father or mother shall be put to death. (Exodus 21:15 NAB)
If a man lies with a male as with a women, both of them shall be put to death for their abominable deed; they have forfeited their lives. (Leviticus 20:13 NAB)
I for one would greatly appreciate it if you'd keep your ignorant, stupid comments to yourself.
The 28-year-old Islamist terrorist who was shot dead by police after murdering two people on London Bridge last Friday swore in a BBC report nearly a dozen years ago that he was not a terrorist.
Are you literally stupid? He wasn't a terrorist twelve years ago. What the hell is it about idiot Republicans that they don't understand how time works?
In Mexico, basic healthcare is super cheap, but that one lacks quality.
You're hilarious. What good is a healthcare system if it is confined to the rich? I've read two comments from you so far this evening and both of them have illustrated a naivety reserved for people who have never questioned anything in their entire lives.
The problem in the US is government regulation
Cutting regulation was already tried during the Bush Administration and it caused the biggest economic collapse since the Great Depression. Stop repeating corporate propaganda you hear on Fox News. Government regulation is there to protect the consumer you idiot.
It is a form of Social weaponry, in order to create economic growth you need demographic growth... the point of this leftist vision if for people not to have children. Either by copulating with same sex people, aborting their children and destroying the harmony that comes from a functional family.
There's a pretty big problem with your theory that demographic growth = economic growth, which is that space is limited. The population has already exploded from a billion to nearly 8 billion in a mere hundred years, yet all the old problems still exist: inequality, hunger, unemployment etc... Many of them are worse than ever.
Hence, your plan has already been tried and it does not work. Perhaps you thought you could convince people not to have sex unless they earn over 35,000 a year, but I'm afraid that's stupid.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!