I subscribe to the belief that people's intent is what dictates if their behavior is immoral. Thus if one doesn't know thier actions will have negative results why would their actions be more evil than one who knowingly chooses to commit evil.

I'd say the incredible techinical skill of highly creative artists disproves the suggested thesis.

There are two bad choices, savng the 10 is the best of a bad hand.

I'm not sure if this is serious or not, but it seems very clear to me that biological processes or trauma is what causes individuals to die.

The logical fallacy is clear:

Theology X says Y

Theology X is True

There Y is true.

See how this is begging the question? Your conclusion and premises are pretty much the same:

Christainity condemns homosexuality

Chhristainity is the only source of true morals

Therefore we should condemn homosexuality.

Please provide logical, fact supported arguments.

Thats a lie, I read through them and here are some quotes of the topic of gay animals:

Roy and Silo, two male chinstrap penguins at New York's Central Park Zoo, were a couple for about six years

According to University of Oslo zoologist Petter Böckman, about 1,500 animal species are known to practice same-sex coupling, including bears, gorillas, flamingos, owls, salmon and many others.

_______________

So why are you blatantly lying? Because the FACTS contradict your narrow, dogma influenced bigorty?

You ignore the part about supersition and ignorance, which are both near guarenteed in religon. Religon has protected those guilty of pedophilia, and worse, actually encourages anti-logical, anti-scientififc thought which is probably its most dangerous aspect.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_sex_abuse_cases

Examples of, now you may either remain willfully ignorant or except that some priests are pedophiles and that religon has played a part in protecting them.

Well the two most popular religons, Christainity and Islam, do; thus it is reasonable to say that people belive them for the reward, and that it is a dangerous sense of false hope.

Simply put marriage is a partial religious partial moral based institution. The government has no place in either and the domestic partnership does not intrude into those fields.