CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
pic


RSS Choose-life

Reward Points:32
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
86%
Arguments:51
Debates:3
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
8 points

same way as it proves talking snakes and flat Earth .

The talking snake was Satan and the bible supports a round earth please see the book of Job

1 point

That's a terrible argument. This is why people think you are a troll.

1) Apparently 5 people agree with me

2) How so?

Did you see the big bang?

Did you see evolution?

NO

NO you did not there is a difference between observational science and historical science which confuses a lot of people and leads to misconceptions about evolution. Ken Ham made perfect sense in the debate and Bill Nye made a lot of flaws like claiming the bible could of been corrupted like the telephone game when there is many manuscripts of the New Testament and a quite few of the Old Testament too there are some grammatical difference but that doesn't change the meaning of the text significantly.

4 points

Nye's response to hard questions "That's the mystery".

Got to love ignorance.

It's sad that Bill Nye doesn't review his facts

5 points

Actually me and my parents thought Ken Ham won because he has the bible to back up his argument.

2 points

That debate was painful to watch. Ken Ham got his ass handed to him and didn't provide any evidence for his position other than a few arguments from authority. Ken didn't even need to be there. You could have just replaced him with a sound clip that says "the Bible says creation is true" repeating over and over.

My parents thought Ken Ham won.....

7 points

Name one good argument for Ken Ham's belief.

Were you there?

2 points

Down voted because Ken Ham is a fraud who thinks the bible is fact.

That's not a valid reason.....

9 points

The bible disproves the lie of evolution........................................

1 point

In first world countries they do, along with the earth being a sphere and not flat.

Actually in America most people do not believe in Evolution and there is a large controversy so why should we not present the other side?

2 points

Down voted because Ken Ham is a fraud who thinks the bible is face.

The bible is true

Displaying 3 most recent debates.

Winning Position: I am not Chuz-Life my username was inspired by his
Winning Position: Holocaust
Winning Position: Proof being gay is a choice is that ex-gay organizations have overcome their homosexuality

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here