CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS Creed1219

Reward Points:17
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
100%
Arguments:9
Debates:2
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
9 most recent arguments.
1 point

As a high school student, my only complaint is the lack of sufficiently diverse language programs. I was strong-armed into taking Latin due to the Spanish and French classes being full. I believe that mandatory languages are applicable for all grade levels (I erred by specifying to high school only), to both educate students on different cultures, and to prepare them for the workplace.

Creed1219(17) Clarified
1 point

I understand what you are saying; in essentiality, I am just trying to promote healthy debate regarding Constitutional interpretation, as well as seeing what the majority of the people here think regarding the current interpretation.

Creed1219(17) Clarified
1 point

I agree. We were on two different spectrums there, and I think that, in their own rights, both assertions were correct.

2 points

Although the theory doesn't allow for a specific "point", as it defies time, the Big Bang Theory very well could have "happened". Although there is no solid, unarguable proof for it, there is nothing to disprove it either. So, as a matter of my opinion, I do chose to believe the Big Bang Theory.

Creed1219(17) Clarified
1 point

But things that are logically right are not always morally right, things that are legally right are not always either of the two. I am in no way condoning performing illegal activities, rather, I am supporting protests against Judicial rulings which people disagree with. If there is enough support, it could be overturned. The point is, there are many different "rights" in the world; you may be referring to the legal fashion, in which case you would be correct, as they are the highest Judicial power in the land; however, I was referring to moral and logical rightness, which are completely different. Regardless, that was a miscommunication on my part, and I apologize for not clarifying prior.

1 point

I am not opposed to it in principal, although I believe that the money for those classes could be better spent in other programs. Perhaps this topic could be integrated into Psychology/Sociology classes?

2 points

If there is undeniable evidence that someone has performed rape, murder, or cannibalism, I believe that the death penalty should be applied. Although this may seem harsh, it is my belief that this will keep society more civil, given that one will be killed for their crimes, instead of sitting in a prison cell receiving free medicine, food, and even earning degrees. Once a human being has broken the law in any of the aforementioned manners, they are "too far gone", not to mention the money saved by not having prisons filled with dangerous and possibly mentally unstable criminals. That way, more money can be allocated to more deserving programs, such as better rehabilitation programs for drug users and better government healthcare programs for those who need it.

1 point

That's rather faulty logic, is it not? Although the Judicial system is meant to be "right" they have been known to err, given the fact that they are human, with all of the biases and opinions that come with our sentience.

1 point

Your views on Christianity are biased, watered-down, and generally ignorant. Now, I will begin by saying, although I am a deep-seated Atheist, I believe in religious freedom. Now, Christianity is derived from Judaism, which was no doubt based on some Graeco-Roman or Mesopot, etc. Regardless, I can't think of any major religion which has a background history consisting of "campfire tales". Your entire premises is simply not sufficient for debate; rather, it seems you are content with "flaming". While Christianity/Judaism may have been influenced by astronomy (I am not sure whether you actually meant to say astrology, which is different), the Bible could not have been purely based upon some archaic form of astronomy. Over the course of human history, the true origins of the old religions have been lost to us, and as such, there is no truly arguable point to make here. They may have been "primitive campfire tales", they may have been human political machinations, they may have even been records of extraterrestrial encounters (that was a joke).

Displaying 2 most recent debates.

Winning Position: Should Foreign Languages Be Mandatory for High Schoolers?

About Me


"I'm a High School Junior who hopes to become a secondary school History teacher."

Biographical Information
Name: Christian Reed
Gender: Male
Age: 25
Marital Status: Single
Political Party: Independent
Country: United States
Religion: Atheist
Education: High School

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here