Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 7 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
Arguments: | 4 |
Debates: | 1 |
Heh, If you think child porn is disgusting and the people viewing it are then what's your preference? There's old person porn, dead person, transgender, milf, animal, hairy man, fat man, muscle man and the list goes on. No if child pornography viewing were to be legal that would hurt anybody. After all it's a matter of preference.
Hey if you think child porn is disgusting well what's your preference? There's old person porn, dead person porn, transexual porn, animal porn, milf porn, hairy men, muscle men, twink, bisexual and the list goes on. There would be no harm in making child porn legal. (I think were talkin' sex scenes with minors). I say consensual sex is good sex. So as long as no one is raped everything is legal.
The thing is mister that abuse is not what I think should be legal. Abuse is defined as harmful injurious or offensive treatment. This definitely doesn't define any sort of consensual sex, whether it be between an 8 yr old and a 15 yr old or anyone else, that wants to know about sex. A child knows "what's happening to them" when it experiences it given the child was taught what sex is, which it should be before it takes action. Freedom of choice should not be the governments to rob from civilians. When a child has curiosity about sex and when it is taught what it is that individual should be allowed to experience it if it so chooses. Denying people pleasure makes many miserable, believe me.
|