Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 0 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
Arguments: | 2 |
Debates: | 0 |
Soup: a liquid dish, typically savoury and made by boiling meat, fish, or vegetables etc. in stock or water.
Cereal itself is neither savoury nor a liquid – only when combined with milk does a 'bowl of cereal' even remotely resemble a bowl of soup.
To quote one daring YouTube comment I remember reading not long ago: "Refusing a woman the right to rid her body of an unwanted parasite is giving her fewer rights than a corpse. If you are anti-abortion, you are anti-woman."
I have to say I do agree with the statement above. On top of that, the "pro-life" stance doesn't seem to have any logical argument.
If you are pro-life, why is the birth of the baby the only thing you supposedly care about?
If you are pro-life, why doesn't the life of the woman who is forced to carry, give birth to and care for the unwanted child ever come up in your debates?
If you are pro-life, why is your immediate reaction to a young woman seeking an abortion to shame and blame her for "doing it if she didn't want a child"?
If you are pro-life, why do you relentlessly argue against and shame women who want abortions, and then suddenly lose interest when the child is born into an unhappy life with a parent/parents who didn't want it in the first place?
|