- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Regardless, the Flat Earth Theory is based on conspiracy not factual evidence. It more or less dismisses anything contrary to their beliefs as Jesuit deception.
From the Ancient Greeks to Modern-Day Astrophysics we see time and time again there is evidence for a round earth, however talking about these things to a Flat-Earther is impossible.
I became saved at the morning of April 27, 2015 after struggling for months prior with porn. After being saved I studied Creation vs Evolution and started with the understanding you have. I strengthened my arguments as time progressed. Then I wanted to make sure my beliefs were as biblical as possible. I used various study's/subjects such as Sociology to understand about the culture of the Hebrews and the surrounding peoples around them. Over the course of time I have changed my opinions on somethings for example the major sins of Sodom was greed and pride not homosexuality
Behold, this was the iniquity of thy sister Sodom, pride, fullness of bread, and abundance of idleness was in her and in her daughters, neither did she strengthen the hand of the poor and needy.
Or that Matthew 7:1-6 was talking about hypocritical judgement
Judge not, that ye be not judged.
2 For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.
3 And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
4 Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye?
5 Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye.
6 Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.
Regardless I haven't said any direct profanities against you. Just minor criticism at the worst.
Yes he talked about the depraved human heart he is also talking about their pagan society.
Here I will define what I mean by "I am against the social aspect of homosexuality especially dealing with the family construct". We have biological roles the mothers is to care and nurture the child while the fathers is to shape the child and forming the child's ideology. In my opinion, with two fathers or two mothers you will never get both sides of the coin. Like I said as long as I am not forced to marry them, forced to serve them, or persecuted by them I could care less about their actions. Even if I was to say it was a sin I wouldn't directly say that first I would give them the good news and do one of two things 1. let them figure it out 2. directly tell them after they researched the bible. You do realize you can be Christian and not care about homosexuality. I do not need to go with picket signs preaching God hates fags (which he doesn't) to go to heaven. To reiterate from what I see Paul is talking about Romes paganism, their sex rituals, and orgies.
Yes I do care about what the Bible says about sin. Go ahead give me all of the scriptures of what the Bible says about Homosexuality and we will debate them. No I am not in some kind of spineless sect who cares about political correctness to be frank I don't care about political correctness in fact, it needs to be abolished so we can have honest conversations not play kiss-ass trying not to say something that falls under hate speech. No I use NIV, NET, and KJV not just NIV. I chose Einstein cause I liked his work and theory.
I didn't necessarily slander Baptists just gave some general objections about their reputation. And sure I will take a look at those books. Just some questions. What defects do the Calvinist denomination have? How am I insulting John The Baptist by commenting on just the denomination? How does the act of baptizing which is a major enrollment for most denominations only restrictive for Baptists in the sense of Christ's baptism? If Jesus was a baptist would he slander the other denominations even though most of them follow his word correctly? Keep in mind I do not intend to slander any denomination.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!