- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Gosh, people like you annoy the fuck out of me. You criticize one word because you hate me for being Atheist, yet you are so stupid and unaware of how much the actual argument destroys your religion as a whole.
If you want to reply to me, get the damn argument and dispute it, piece by piece.
Great. Ignore everything else in my argument.
They are NOT getting paid. YOU are the one who has forgotten how unrighteous keeping slaves is. You are the one who shows no effort to find out anything about it, keeps preaching his double standard and with no responsibility in sight deludes himself into thinking his liberal agenda has anything to do with righteousness.
Calm down mate... why the need to blame me for everything?
Where is your distinction between wage labor and slavery? There is no way to avoid violence or exploitation but you want to avoid responsibility. You don't have the balls to do what is necessary.
Way to blow things out of proportion. Have you considered the fact that I was thinking about the people who work for Cadbury? You can't expect me to have instant expansive knowledge of the people who produce chocolate...
You don't have the balls to do what is necessary.
Wow, where the hell did this come from? You can't expect me to know everything about the slave children and chocolate!? And you also can't expect me to leave my house, travel to poor countries and give all my money away? Because seriously, what the hell am I meant to do about this shit when I'm still in school?
And how could you make such a shitty assumption that I am for some reason exacerbating slavery and being completely oblivious to slavery for not knowing one thing?
AND, just because slavery currently exists in the world DOESN'T make it morally acceptable. You're the one here following the Cult of Christianity which supports slavery in the bible. I can give you verses, some of which say that you must beat your slaves to the brink of death- all of which are included in the bible, ordered by God himself.
Suck on that.
(And thanks for rape-down-voting me like an explosive noob. It really helps. Because it's not like I would do it to you; I'm cool like that.)
We do already "have slaves". How do you think your chocolate was made? Delusional liberal, and that's not even counting wage labor, which is essentially the same thing if you think about it. There's no way to avoid exploitation or violence (the more humane version of it, because there is at least direct responsibility) to arrange society unless you're a utopian.
You're embarrassing your own humanity with this religion.
The bible has verses that state that you must beat your slaves. The people who make chocolate? At least they are getting paid, and not getting chained up.
And have you forgotten how unrighteous keeping slaves is? Seriously, you are the delusional one.
Only if necessary but that's the mans decision in the first place. I suppose there's a point that it's unnecessary with the new technology and so on, but I would argue it's not morally better to have a robot beat her instead.
It's not moral at all.
Is this what you want? A whole world of enslaved women?
It's a natural reaction, but it is one that is barbaric. I don't think preventing the death of more humans is idiocy. Actually, I believe that most criminals can be rehabilitated, instead of thrown in a cage. (mental issues analysed and treated with medicine or Psychologists.)
The methods you are thinking of should be methods of the past. We as the human race should look forward from barbarianism, an immature, unenlightened way of thinking. It's impossible to think we would still do this in the future, taking many lives, possibly innocent lives, by law, since it has happened before.
I'm not saying that I wouldn't want the murderer to suffer, but there has to be a way to get over that phase of revenge, since it does nothing but tarnish the human race. The murderer should get rehabilitized to become a functioning member of society, as that would be the most productive thing to do. When a person does something horrible, we no longer see them as a human that values their life, we just see them as an epitome of hate. We need to see through that, think of the possibilities and methods that can fix them. If there is no solution in sight, pitch them as slaves, to be imprisoned in a productive manner. Slavery would be a better, far more productive alternative than death, so why is it legal the other way around?