- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
They should build something more productive to society. They should re-build the World Trade Centers, or at least build something as beneficial as them. I don't care if it's a Mosque, a Church, a Movie Theater, a supermarket, whatever. They should build something worthwhile.
No. It's absolute truth that a triangle drawn on a 2D plane will have 180 degrees. It's true that the ratio of the diameter to the circumference of a circle is pi. It's true that the integral of velocity with respect to time represents position.
That is "absolute truth." We put restrictions on those statements so that they will be absolute truth. I don't see how you can say that it's not absolute truth that a triangle on a 2D plane will have 180 degrees just because it doesn't apply to every other case (meaning cases that that law doesn't apply to).
I know I shouldn't feed the troll, but I'll bite.
Most of your argument is based around the "Clockmaker" argument. Basically, you're arguing that because the universe is so complex, some sentient being had to create it (ergo the "Clockmaker"). Know what else is complex? A Kangaroo. How do kangaroos come about? Two kangaroos have sex. So, using your logic, the complexity of the universe is evidence for a mommy and a daddy universe having sex.