CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
pic


RSS EmilyWu

Reward Points:7
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
88%
Arguments:7
Debates:0
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
7 most recent arguments.
1 point

Exactly! He did not know anything about the troops ! That's the main problem which he did not solve. And about the surrender, if General Yamashito threatened him, General Percival could also have done the same thing to him! Maybe he could have use the numerical advantage of the British troops against General Yamashito but why didn't he? Because he didn't know! See, it all goes back to square one, the main problem of him not knowing his troops.

1 point

It is a fact that all the better leaders and troops were left in Britain to defend the country, so it is no reason that General Percival should worry over this, instead he should have spent his time defending Singapore.

1 point

General Percival did not have to protect Britain, his main job was to defend Singapore, so he should have made do with the equipment and troops he was given.

0 points

Precisely! General Percival should have more shown more leadership under those circumstances, even if times were messy and chaotic, he should have kept his calm and help to defend Singapore, all great leaders would have done that.

1 point

He was indecisive and timid. When discussing the terms of surrender with General Yamashito, General Percival wanted to buy time from the Japanese but failed to do so once General Yamashito starting threatening him. The reason why he failed to buy time was because he felt frightened by General Yamashito's threat and thus gave in to him. Had he been more decisive and argued General Yamashito back, he might have been able to buy more time for the British--enough time for them to counterattack and turn the tables against the Japanese. So, General Percival should be made responsible for the fall of Singapore.

He did not lead his troops well. Although it is true that the troops given to him were disorganised to begin with, General Percival did not try to get them organised before they went to battle. As a leader, General Percival should have been quick and change his plans to the current situation. He should have noticed the major problem of communication within the troops and quickly solved it. However, he failed to do so. So, General Percival should be made responsible for the fall of Singapore.

1 point

Now, You can even use cell phones to take down notes, it is very convenient when you don't have a pen and paper around...

1 point

There is already a Men's Charter, even though it is not called Men's Charter but another name....

EmilyWu has not yet created any debates.

About Me


Biographical Information
Gender: Male
Marital Status: Single
Political Party: Republican
Country: Singapore

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here