It is a debate site, you are supposed to debate, not preach, not rant at, not get belligerent at. You deserve to be banned.

I assume with the immaturity shown in this post that you to are a troll just seeking attention?

Car companies

All men (and women) have the right to defend themselves or those they love. If a man is running at a cop or another man or woman he has the right to blow caps into him. However to kill for any other reason then self defense or to execute a serial killer, rightfully so is illegal.

Whatever For?

If you do this under any circumstances you're a little bitch. Simple as that.

I believe your statement is a little too bland. For you say UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, so my question is. If someone were to be cyber bullying or getting personal within the debate toward you or any other user, would you not restrict their access?

You're even more pathetic if you ban people then continue to respond to them over and over like you're somehow winning the debate when they can't respond to what you're saying.

I also believe this is a debate site rather than a site to rant.

Seriously, how completely pathetic do you have to be to make a little safe space that acts as an echo chamber for yourself and your shitty fucking ideas? I'm looking at you Saintnow and From Within. You guys do realize this is a DEBATE site right?

I could almost ask you the same question. Why rant about it and look like a child by swearing to your hearts content and then naming people. Rather than stating something a bit more like this.

Whatever would be the point of restricting the access of someone simply due to their personal biases and beliefs?

It isnt very hard not to sound belligerent.

The whole point is to argue with people you disagree with.

Argue and Debate, while simialar, are indeed different.

But you can't do that which to me is a pretty strong indicator that you guys are incapable of defending your garbage beliefs. And on some level you know how fucking stupid and weak your positions are.

100% True, I agree with a lot said here besides the belligerence shown and the blandness of the first statement.

life, liberty or property, without due process of law" or to "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Within this sentence it says clearly that all shall have equal rights within the jurisdictuon of the USA.

So assuming your talking about Gay Marriage then it says that Gay Marriage should be legalized.

Thank you sir.

Just a random poll, if you feel the need you can attempt to prove your God is real (I didnt say you couldnt I just said you didnt have to). Hope that clears it up :)

Your issue?