CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS FelipeVieira

Reward Points:8
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
89%
Arguments:5
Debates:1
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
5 most recent arguments.
1 point

Comunism, capitalism and anarquism don't work. We need a new sistem. A sistem that there will be justice and equality. That's praticly what we need at first place

2 points

None of them works. What we need is a new system. The capitalism is too much individual and always will have someone there winning and all the other losing or even dying. Communism doesn't works too. A new system maybe works, but we have to have people that understand about it, but the poor part of the population is a problem...

1 point

Brazil is not powered military and the USA,UK or Canada would beat it easily. Russia, India, China, Brazil and South Africa are undeveloped so UK, USA and Canada would beat it because of they have more military power. It is a kind of a stupid question because the BRICS isn't exactly an ally. Is just the countries that are evolving more, but they wouldn't have reasons to make an ally just because of that.

1 point

Yes it should. The principal argument of who doesn't want to the law allow that say that it's against the Bible. So, following that type of thinking, let's see what you probably doesn't follow AND is on it... 1 Corinthians 11:3

3 "But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman [is] the man; and the head of Christ [is] God."

1 Corinthians 11:7 - 9

8 For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man.

9 Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man.

Esther 1:22

22 For he sent letters into all the king's provinces, into every province according to the writing thereof, and to every people after their language, that every man should bear rule in his own house, and that [it] should be published according to the language of every people.

THE BIBLE IS SEXIST! GO SEARCH IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE ME. NOW, ANSWER ME, DO YOU AGREE WITH THIS? DOES THE LAW AGREE WITH THIS? DOES THE SOCIETY IN THE GENERAL AGREE? SO WHY A MAN CAN'T MARRIAGE ANOTHER MAN AND A WOMAN CAN'T MARRIAGE ANOTHER WOMAN? ANSWER ME THAT.

2 points

The tobacco and the cigarettes should be banned little by little even for who wants to smoke. If the people smoke, the producers will continue producing. If they do it, more and more people will commit the error too cause the propagandas will continue. And some people do want to stop smoking. And more, if you smokes is your choice, but it is annoying for non-smokers and it prejudice the passive smokers too! It is a bad thing for who smokes, who doesn't do it and for who wants to stop because of the examples that that person has!


Winning Position: New Sistem

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here