@Atrag It may not have any KNOWN problems but why risk it? If it works well already they may as well keep it. I know its hard for most humans but you can go with out your phone for a few hours.

Yes doesn't even cover it.

Our methods of hunting and killing may of changed and yeah it does do damage to these creatures but understanding that our farmers have to give a supply to 7 billion people its no wonder that they turned to factory farming.

And the circle of life. The cows and pigs are born they eat the grass and hay etc they grow they reproduce they get die we eat them-

Humans we eat the cows and pigs and all different types of meat, we grow, we reproduce, we die, the insects and under ground critters eat us which makes the grass grow for the cows/pigs etc to eat.

All swings back around. Its food.

seriously?!

How is water harming animals?! what the shit?!

someone go grab me a steak so i can slap some bitches up side the head.

Obviously its an awful ordeal for these animals to go through and no it shouldn't happen, however in a world that has a population of over 7 billion and counting it is physically impossible to give these creature the life they deserve and get produce to the demand of humans.

It is a cheap and quick.

Factory Farming: Bad

but Good for being able to feed man kind.

Not natural?

Do you use a car sir? Do you use a mircowave? Have you ever been in a plane?

How can you use this as an argument when half the things that humans do in this day and age is "not natural". There are many other species on this planet that are homosexual are they sinners? Will they be sent to hell fire? or does it scare men thinking that some dude may stick his dick in their arse?

I do apologies for my bluntness (and possible rudeness) towards you but I personally fucking despise people who say its wrong. Because its not. Its two people in love doing their day to day things, living a normal life, they go to work they pay taxes. You know what they are exactly the same as you trying to live their fucking lives with out having some dicks judge them.

^ I do hope that there is an unbelievable amount of sarcasm in what you just said.

The Big Bang Theory is the leading explanation about how the universe began. At its simplest, it talks about the universe as we know it starting with a small singularity, then inflating over the next 13.8 billion years to the cosmos that we know today.

Because current instruments don't allow astronomers to peer back at the universe's birth, much of what we understand about the Big Bang Theory comes from mathematical theory and models. Astronomers can, however, see the "echo" of the expansion through a phenomenon known as the cosmic microwave background.

In the first second after the universe began, the surrounding temperature was about 10 billion degrees Fahrenheit (5.5 billion Celsius), according to NASA. The cosmos contained a vast array of fundamental particles such as neutrons, electrons and protons. These decayed or combined as the universe got cooler.

This early soup would have been impossible to look at, because light could not carry inside of it. "The free electrons would have caused light (photons) to scatter the way sunlight scatters from the water droplets in clouds," NASA stated. Over time, however, the free electrons met up with nuclei and created neutral atoms. This allowed light to shine through about 380,000 years after the Big Bang.

This early light — sometimes called the "afterglow" of the Big Bang — is more properly known as the cosmic microwave background (CMB). It was first predicted by Ralph Alpher and other scientists in 1948, but was found only by accident almost 20 years later. [Images: Peering Back to the Big Bang & Early Universe]

Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson, both of Bell Telephone Laboratories in Murray Hill, New Jersey, were building a radio receiver in 1965 and picking up higher-than-expected temperatures, according to NASA. At first, they thought the anomaly was due to pigeons and their dung, but even after cleaning up the mess and killing pigeons that tried to roost inside the antenna, the anomaly persisted.

Simultaneously, a Princeton University team (led by Robert Dicke) was trying to find evidence of the CMB, and realized that Penzias and Wilson had stumbled upon it. The teams each published papers in the Astrophysical Journal in 1965.

(source: http://www.space.com/25126-big-bang-theory.html )

Really important debate but i cant take it seriously because its ISIS if anyone on here has watched Archer I think you can understand.

Personally though I don't know what they should do. Either way many civilians will die or be seriously hurt and lets not even mention the mental damage that is happening to the children of Iraq. If not from the terrorist attacks then from the drones that'll be falling via the American Armed Forces. Its a hard one to decide you either help but do damage or don't help and see what happens. I truly feel for the man/women who has to come to the end decision.

How is it a sin to love?! How?!

it makes no sense that a god who sent his son to teach man kind of love and compassion can turn his back on a group of people just because.

Please explain to me my dear LITTERALLY how is homosexuality a sin?

I will always back science simply for the fact that they have done so much research, there is so much data and evidence that highly suggests that theory's such as the Big Bang did happen! However other than a 2000 year old book and word of mouth there is nothing to prove that God exists. For myself personally God will only be real on the day of Armageddon.