Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 4 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 86% |
Arguments: | 4 |
Debates: | 0 |
There will be no matter what a majority, but with the constitution, it won't guarantee the majority their power for long as eventually the majority could become minority. I agree that men are still be able to be corrupted, but with a large republic, it'll allow corruption to happen less compared to past governments like small republics.
The claim that "having a central government would take away representation from the people" is far from what the constitution stands for. The constitution allows fair representation from the the people as the people can elect representatives into the House, in which they can fight for what the people represent. They can keep the other bodies of government in check as the House is basically made for the people.
With the failure of the Articles of the Confederation, the states are way to overly democratic. They have created majority factions that have dominated legislation in favor of themselves. It has gotten so bad to the point debtors are paying off debt in CARROTS!! This is why we need to move away from a direct democracy and with a large republic, we can squash these majority factions! With a large republic, there will be so many different opinions, it'll make it hard to form a majority and that majority will not stay a majority for long. Also, with a large republic, it is hard to corrupt officials due to how tedious and hard the system is built. These large factions also will allow representation from the population in our government. The constitution in turn will equal out the playing field and allow more equality and fairness for the minority.
For many generations, it has been debated within our school systems on how the curriculum involving our countries past racial issues should be handled in the classrooms. However, one thing that is rarely brought up is how the teachers themselves can implement their own beliefs, opinions, or not fully convey all the information in the classroom. This is important because there are situations in which some teachers can be prejudice against a certain race. So because of that, if race was talked more or less in schools, how would that stop those situations involving those particular teachers from happening?
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |