Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 1 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 83% |
Arguments: | 2 |
Debates: | 0 |
A credible network of alliances might have ensured a cheaper and quicker victory over Hitler, had war come. On the other hand, what would have been happened if this only deterred Hitler? Would a Europe divided among democrats, fascists, and communists, and possessing jet aircrafts, nuclear weapons, and ballistic missiles, be more inviting than that one that emerged after 1945?
Right.
Even though appeasement did not work in the end, they had no way of knowing that Hitler would not keep to his promise. Had they known about Hitler's tactics, they would not have tried appeasement. However, since they did not know what Hitler was going to do, they were right to try appeasement to try to avoid starting a war.
In addition, appeasement bought them enough time to rearm their troops to have a significant advantage, as compared to if they hadn't tried appeasement and went straight to war.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |