Ohhhh I'm sorry but you seem to have missed the whole point point, How come every other well developed country in The world combined (Europe and Australia) don't have the same amount of mass shootings in the last five years as the great USA has in the last 6 months? You don't need guns at all and there inclusion in everyday life leads to death and misery. The only possible exception I could think of is for pest control.

Because these weapons aren't shields they require special threat assessment training to anticipated a threat and act before it happens. Someone who already has a gun drawn will always kill these "good guys" your not goddamm cowboys of the west

Could you give me one of these reasons please? Yours sincerely ignorant child

No they don't they want to take alllll guns out of the system you conspiracy idiot 😂. Some guns only use is for killing people now if you can't even see the logic in removing acces to that small percentage of guns then you're a lost cause sorry buddy

This person has no idea how gun laws work ^^

They make it harder for citizens to get guns, law abiding or otherwise. In most countries they restrict it down so a gun is almost impossible to get without a good reason l. AND even when you do finally get permission to apply for a license you have to go through hours of training. But as long as guns are a normal part of your society you will have mass shooting

This debate is the funniest thing I've heard all day, thank you.

I'm not actually from America so I'm part of the rest of the world

Smiling as your country goes to shit.

Every civilised country in the world has restrictions on guns.

For some reason every other civilised country has less to no mass shooting- correlation?

Gun laws make it harder for all citizens, law abiding or not to get a

Gun and this is a good thing!!

The only argument you have for pro guns is this: I really want one, it's not very good but it's the only one you have that the facts stand behind. But since you insist on acting like children the rest of the world will treat you as such.

I'm sorry I'm new to this site but I feel I have to point out the fact that this whole argument is fundamental flawed. I'm not sure where you got your statistics but you can't present them in that way and expect them to make sense or perhaps that was your intention? That 93% represents the actions of individuals something that is completely out of the control of any government. The 7% represent a problem in our society that needs to be addressed.