CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic


Enemies
View All
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic


Hostiles
View All
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic


RSS Jace

Reward Points:5159
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
94%
Arguments:7458
Debates:16
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
1 point

sure, it based itself upon slavery and excluded most people from the process of governance but for those who were counted as citizens it was every part a democracy.

1 point

as with offline therapy the ethics vary depending upon execution. for instance, whether a therapist discloses the unique security and privacy risks of online therapy is not especially different from whether a therapist discloses the general security and privacy risks of offline therapy (e.g. insurance claims, note taking and storage, colleague consultations, research information gathering, etc.). similarly, whether a therapist informs and avails themselves of adequate secure online data transmission options is similar to whether a therapist informs and avails themselves of adequate offline security options (e.g. office location, reception practices, etc.). and so forth.

0 points

hate speech fundamentally incites violence.

Jace(5159) Clarified
1 point

that deconstructionism is compatible with my nihilistic perspective does not entail that they are the same. there are deconstructionists who are not nihilists, for whom my deconstructionist position on globalism could be of interest. moreover, not everyone is so closed-minded to suppose that perspectives are uninteresting merely because they are different.

Jace(5159) Clarified
1 point

your misidentification of philosophical positions and disinterest in engaging those who disagree with you is not at all convincing to anyone other than people who share in your misinformed disinterest.

Jace(5159) Clarified
1 point

my original point was not that the visage of unity serves well enough for nations, cities, and towns. my point was that unity is a visage and does not exist. also nations, cities, and towns do not exist.

Jace(5159) Clarified
1 point

ah, well fair enough then. tho im afraid i cant do much more with that since i don't understand how it connects up with globalism being viable.

1 point

no. ihdk why u even think it could be enough.

1 point

a 'global state' will only ever be a visage of unification, just as current non-global states are and always have been.

Jace(5159) Clarified
1 point

in defense of ur rep, hummingbirds are better than humans

Displaying 10 most recent debates.

Winning Position: The Ethics of Gender (and Identity)
Winning Position: Does the sacred have intrinsic value?
Winning Position: Yes
Winning Position: What is the appropriate response to ignorance?
Winning Position: No

About Me


Biographical Information
Gender: Fellow
Marital Status: Single
Political Party: Other
Country: Vatican City
Websites: Nihilist Owlman

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here