yeah im sure it was that and not ur lack of basic reading comprehension skills that made you overlook "im necessarily not a eugenicist" lmfao

well, not surprisingly you missed the part where im not a proponent of eugenics. gg dumbass.

i can and have justified killing the unborn and infants. there's no dodging. you just have to keep asserting that im dodging it b/c you werent prepared for me to not dodge and don't have any argument to make. lmao. what a joke.

nope. im an authoritarian who wants to control everyone's bodies, without any regard to sex.

eugenics attempts to 'improve' the human species by selective breeding. as im advocating the categorical elimination of all breeding, im necessarily not a eugenicist. and im still not a lib lmao. idk why ur so obssessed w/ trying to put me in that box.

i categorically endorse abortion. i categorically endorse infanticide. there's no inconsistency.

again, my argument has never been just that procreation is selfish. my argument has been that it is selfish and violent. u have to repeat ur strawman b/c u can't muster an actual argument.

nah, c u just asserted shit again without giving any reasons. im done bro.

i am perfectly fine with the killing of anything that is not sentient. whether it be a fetus, infant, etc. makes no difference to me.

as i already said, i think that anyone who voluntarily procreates is a despicable person, including both the male and the female. i do not think that anyone should be allowed to procreate, be they male or female. that's not misogynistic.

nope. im not pro-choice. im anti-choice and pro-abortion. i favor compulsory sterilization (males and females) and compulsory abortion for anyone who slips through the cracks on sterilization. so, no, im not a pro-choice lib.

nothing ive said is inconsistent. i endorse abortion. i endorse infanticide. my endorsements have nothing to do with consent. that was little_cheeb's criteria (i confused you for them since i originally was responding to them).

i already explained why procreating to "save the world" is selfish and asinine. im not going to repeat myself. you can engage the reasoning i already provided or not. i don't really care. my objection was never just procreation is selfish. it is that it is violence perpetrated for selfish reasons.

reasserting that the fetus/humans have inherent value and worth is not an explanation for why i should believe that assertion. the same goes for you reasserting that the differential capacities between a fetus and an adult are irrelevant.

i explicitly endorsed infanticide already. what, exactly, am i dodging.

well, if that's the motivation why stop at guns use nukes

edit: lmao just saw the date stamp is 10 years ago. most belated quip ive ever made.

all racial narratives are myths. anyone who believes in them is weak and pathetic.