- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).|
Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
nope. im an authoritarian who wants to control everyone's bodies, without any regard to sex.
eugenics attempts to 'improve' the human species by selective breeding. as im advocating the categorical elimination of all breeding, im necessarily not a eugenicist. and im still not a lib lmao. idk why ur so obssessed w/ trying to put me in that box.
i categorically endorse abortion. i categorically endorse infanticide. there's no inconsistency.
again, my argument has never been just that procreation is selfish. my argument has been that it is selfish and violent. u have to repeat ur strawman b/c u can't muster an actual argument.
nah, c u just asserted shit again without giving any reasons. im done bro.
i am perfectly fine with the killing of anything that is not sentient. whether it be a fetus, infant, etc. makes no difference to me.
as i already said, i think that anyone who voluntarily procreates is a despicable person, including both the male and the female. i do not think that anyone should be allowed to procreate, be they male or female. that's not misogynistic.
nope. im not pro-choice. im anti-choice and pro-abortion. i favor compulsory sterilization (males and females) and compulsory abortion for anyone who slips through the cracks on sterilization. so, no, im not a pro-choice lib.
nothing ive said is inconsistent. i endorse abortion. i endorse infanticide. my endorsements have nothing to do with consent. that was little_cheeb's criteria (i confused you for them since i originally was responding to them).
i already explained why procreating to "save the world" is selfish and asinine. im not going to repeat myself. you can engage the reasoning i already provided or not. i don't really care. my objection was never just procreation is selfish. it is that it is violence perpetrated for selfish reasons.
reasserting that the fetus/humans have inherent value and worth is not an explanation for why i should believe that assertion. the same goes for you reasserting that the differential capacities between a fetus and an adult are irrelevant.