Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 5 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 82% |
Arguments: | 4 |
Debates: | 0 |
It is not how I "feel". Look at our world today. So much has changed, in very little time. Scientific procedures develop so quickly today that there are very few procedures that do not make critical progress. You also make it very unclear as to what is "immoral" about this "behavior" (mind you it is not a behavior, it is a procedure).
Cloning should not be used to replace the way organisms reproduce, it should be used more as a cure. While I agree that massive cloning would result in less variation, cloning does not have to be used in this way. Instead, we can use cloning to cure individuals, and does not necessarily mean that we will genetically modify people all the time.
Although it has a low rate of success, cloning is a new procedure. Who knows what the future will bring? Like any other science, cloning could become incredibly efficient and safer. I feel that the pros to cloning outweigh the drawbacks and issues we face today.
Species that have a difficult time reproducing can be repopulated. Cloning can be used to repopulate endangered species!
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |