CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS JimHookah

Reward Points:8
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
90%
Arguments:8
Debates:0
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
8 most recent arguments.
1 point

You have as much a right to claim you're Jewish as someone has to claim a gender. Just like those claims you may be met with gate keeping from people who want to tell you what defines a true Jew, man, woman, black, Christian, etc.

All identifications of religion and race are confining and quite frankly beneath the individual and his desires. Where was your church or people to get you laid and protect your rights? Thus I find the whole concept of group identify to be an eye roll at best. Yes, I do think if someone feels like a certain gender you should respect pronouns... Sometimes. Depends on how mad I am really. I'd call a heterosexual man a woman if he was annoying me lol. All the same you are indeed Jewish if you say you are. Doesn't mean I can't use that as an excuse to express distaste for you and use your own labels against you.

1 point

I get what you're saying, but disagree on several key points.

1: The notion of women making money and not being love piggies who exist solely for my pleasure.

2: Denouncing the good that comes from the decay of civilization in rape and other sex related crimes lol.

3: We'd still come back to the same predicaments. Because I guarantee you, you make brothels and they'll couple whoredom with unions to say we should be able to deny services to non-Chads. The left already is coupling sex work with fiscal leftism enough. This would just make it easier for them if we legalized prostitution unless we go about it carefully.

1 point

It is. We don't even have this argument when it involves women. Culturally women get away with rape, do we even use the word rape when it's initiated by a woman? We have to shed our fake soy tears if she's single and getting ghosted when she's a washed up hag who wouldn't look at anyone under six foot.

And the worst part is I don't actually blame women as a whole for this despite every reason to hate them. Men's oppression stems from men. More accurately simps. Men who just bring other men down cause they're hateful losers and they're not even developing a defense mechanism to obtain. Being some reddit cuck isn't going to get you laid, it isn't even gonna get your revenge. You're not Elliot Rodger OR A self actualized person. You're just a petty and vindictive gremlin who should be shot. So the way you combat this meta toxic culture is counter cultural rhetoric. You are indeed entitled to sex and should fuck little cunnies on the streets. Like Mr. Garrison said on South Park, fuckem all to death.

1 point

ACAB and I mean that literally. As an institution police only exist to hassle people just trying to live their life. The serious crimes Karen is so concerned about and trying to justify an active militia for is solved by detective work, hardly police. Police are by their nature just armed thugs whom are there to intimidate passerbys and scare people into keeping a low profile. Any argument that there's good cops who really just wanna go after horrible guys like some make believe super hero are in the wrong line of work. Even if we gacet "the good cops" the benefit of the doubt, which don't. All evidence supports the contrary... But even so, that one good cop is gonna be discharged cause he's not playing ball with the unions and corruption. He's going to quickly become desensitized to the pressures of what constitutes a crime and filling quotas. How often he's to keep his mouth shut about our actual rights. Name me one time when a cop read someone their rights they mentioned jury nullification. They don't. Most don't even know what rhat is. Cops are not experts on law, they're not protecting your rights as only you can do that for yourself, and they're barely even going after "bad guys" whatever the hell that means.

So yes, get rid of police.

1 point

No-one is saying Alex shouldn't suffer. At least I'm not. But this isn't the right way to go about it. You don't solve moderators by being one. And trust me I've been bitter toward Alex Jones for over fifteen years for how I was treated on old prison planet forums.

But the same arguments used on him was the ones mods use against us. Karma perhaps, but Karma is a load of crap on a philosophical and practical level. The fact is there's nothing good about using moderator tactics and standards of practice. It's dangerous and radioactive. When I say moderators I mean the deliberate act of making laws and reason not matter. It's all just arbitrary whatever this typically pedophile and worse person than the one being punished says.

1 point

If by white man you mean the Jews. I'm not here to speak ill of white people, but educate my brothers on it was the Jews who brought in those slave ships, funded the Klan, the entire reason the Anti-defamation league was formed was too incriminate a black man for the sake of the Jewish one who most likely did the rape.

Why is Africa still in shambles? Because of imperialism, because of hardships, bad soil, there's lots of factors. If you wanna argue some pseudo social Darwinism about races and different levels of intelligence and ethical standards I couldn't care less. But need I remind you it's white people who are most afraid of their porn history being revealed. Which is ironic as they're also the ones who complain the most about the state of sexual deviance. White people like to complain but not do anything about problems. Makes them the perfect scapegoat for the ones who do make problems for kings. Wakanda Forever.

1 point

I have no doubt you were wrongly harassed by mods. Partially your own fault for trusting them. You should know better. Mods have been a problem for 30+ years. I've been talking about it for 20 of them.

What made you think you'd be different? What, because you're such a polite and likable person? You think every single person whose ever been assaulted by a mod had it coming except you? And yes I say assaulted. Mods assault when they ban and edit posts, slander when they make up reasons why, harass when they target certain people. The only reason they get away with it is the shaky pretense we're NOT people online. Giving then full right to do it treating us as less than animals but key point here...if we're not legal persons why aren't more people posting child porn or bomb threats? Surely the mod is liable. Clean it up janny, your life is literally on the line.

I'm not arguing pathetic run around topics like free speech or If you personally were slighted. I'm saying either mods are liable for everything or they've committed countless crimes and we're all entitled to reimbursing. That's THE LAW it's the law anywhere in the world and it has to be. And before someone brings up section 230, A solely American thing, I need remind them section 230 ALSO validates what I just said as the American government was leaning toward website liability but they get protections for doing it for free. However because they just ban everybody and act are super petty and vindictive, doesn't matter if we're talking here, discord, reddit, 4chan, Twitter... This proves they acted in bad faith and committed FRAUD against the federal government.

Mods are criminals.

They are not your friends.

No amount of them banning people you dislike is worth them existing in the first place.

1 point

No, how can you be? Technically the only life you are obligated to protect is your own. I'd argue that the best defense for not doing something is in fact your own safety. I wouldn't throw myself into deep waters to maybe save a life at the expense of my own. Would I do it for my child? Are we talking a son or daughter? LOL GOT'EM.

But no. In every sense negligence should not be a crime. I do enough not actively being the one drowning people. I shouldn't have to babysit those I happen to see in need as well.

JimHookah has not yet created any debates.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here