Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Jls21
| Reward Points: | 4 |
| Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
| Arguments: | 4 |
| Debates: | 0 |
The theory of evolution is currently the best explanation for the diversity and complexity of life, given the available evidence.
I think an import point for creationists to consider is that even if the theory of evolution were conclusively proven wrong, that wouldn't mean that creationism wins by default. It would simply mean that we don't know the answer and more investigation is necessary. In order for a theory to be validated, evidence must be presented, and as far as I can tell, no convincing evidence has been presented in favor of creationism. For those who think creationism does have supporting evidence, I highly recommend visiting talkorigins.org.
How is the universe perfect? What would an imperfect universe be like? What is more complex, the universe or an entity capable of creating the universe?
How do you know god is the answer to why societies have laws? So if someone doesn't think killing is wrong, did god not instill a moral compass in them? Is something moral because god says so? If god ordered murder, would it be immoral?
|
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |
