Interesting, i guess all of the children in orphanages all around the world are the ones too ugly to get adopted or something then... In any case, i will never support the giving of birth to unwanted babies for the sole purpose of giving them off to other people, there is Surrogacy and In Vitro Fertilization for that purpose already.

In the event let's say that a certain baby is unlucky or is born under a particular time when Newborn babies are not "In Demand" as you say, do you seriously think it's correct to have it hard-coded in Law that you cannot have an abortion?

I've seen situations of Women who were raped and forced to give birth to the child just to give it up for adoption, when you take away a person's right to choose that kind of extreme situation will happen.

By the way, newborn babies needing a home are a dime a dozen in Africa for instance, why not get them from there if they are in such high demand?

To me honestly this argument comes down to one thing, if the parents don't want the child, how is it humanitarian to bring that child into the world? Who's going to raise the child if the parents (or most likely single-parent) don't want to, or in some cases, lack the financial resources to provide for the child?

Sure the child will live, but in what conditions? getting shuffled from foster home to foster home for years? eating poorly and never really knowing what it's like to have a proper family?

Alright, so a few problems I've seen here, first of all I'm awestruck by the people comparing Open-Source (an INFINITE resource) to things like grain, and beef (FINITE resources)

Communism in my view does not work, for reasons greater than just human nature, there is simply not enough room on earth to produce the kinds of mass goods necessary to keep everyone living a decent life, money on marketing does not really translate to goods, if you take 1 trillion from advertising and invest it into food production, you'll still be limited by things like the reproduction rate of cattle, the time it takes for agricultural resources like vegetables to grow, so on and so forth.

While Capitalism is wasteful, the competition creates a higher quality in the products produced in a Capitalist country as opposed to a Communist country, things like Quality tests, Disease Control would suffer as a result of the frenetic production of goods necessary to feed to whole world and keep everyone happy and as such a Communist country is much more likely to suffer from widespread disease.

However, it is my opinion that Communism is not meant to be applied Worldwide, but rather in small communities, that's why in Communism there is no concept of Nation or Land.

Also, the Russian government was not single-handedly responsible for the killings of Christians and burning of churches in Russia, Marx himself was extremely opposed to the concept of Religion that he blamed for a large part of the world's suffering, it's very difficult to change the whole religious view of a nation overnight without somekind of persecution and the forced closing of any kind of religious building.

In a way, you cannot truly eliminate religion without repression and violence, and even then it takes decades for the remnants of it to fully dissipate.