CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Identify Ally
Declare Enemy
Challenge to a Debate
Report This User

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS KingZong

Reward Points:16
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
88%
Arguments:12
Debates:5
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
0 points

Hitler was a Catholic

Nice try Pinnochio.

"Now I feel as fresh as a colt in the pasture."

Max Domarus, Hitler: Reden und Proklamationen (Hitler: Speeches and Proclamations) 1932–1945, kommentiert von einem deutschen Zeitgenossen, translated in Chris Wilcox and Mary Fran Gilbert (tr.), Hitler: Speeches and Proclamations, 1932–1945: The Chronicle of a Dictatorship (1992), Vol. 2, "Top Secret Steps on the Road to War—The Hossbach Minutes", p. 959, cited to "Notes taken by the author on October 31, 1937, according to information related by the Gau Propagandaleiter Waldemar Vogt (Würzburg, later Berlin)":

Late in October and early in November 1937, Hitler deemed it "absolutely necessary" to reveal to a small group his new religious convictions and his plans for a policy of aggression. He did this in two 'secret speeches,' one in Berlin before the propaganda leaders of the Party, …

While speaking before the propaganda leaders, Hitler's topics included the following: … After long and bitter mental battles, he finally had divorced himself from the religious convictions that still existed from his childhood. "Now I feel as fresh as a colt in the pasture."

https://en.m.wikiquote.org/wiki/Religious viewsofAdolfHitler

1 point

Hitler was a Catholic you stupid fascist dick.

Adolf Hitler quote:

"You see, it's been our misfortune to have the wrong religion. Why didn't we have the religion of the Japanese, who regard sacrifice for the Fatherland as the highest good? The Mohammedan religion too would have been more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?"

Speer, Albert (1997). Inside the Third Reich. New York: Simon and Schuster, p. 96.

https://en.m.wikiquote.org/wiki/Religious viewsofAdolfHitler

The only "Bibles" burned by the Nazis were Jewish Bibles.

The books being burned by ANTIFA have that exact Jewish Bible inside of them, and you know it. You are a NAZI. No doubt in anyone's minds. They are also burning other books that are not the Bible just like Hitler did. Fascists burn books to control and erase what is known about history. You are psychologically ill and clearly a Hitlerian piece of shit.

2 points

With every fibre of my being I detest you and everything you stand for.

Why are you addressing your own self by saying I hate you? Are you fucked in the head you inbred, Hitlerian psychopath?

2 points

That isn't what the poll said at all, you ridiculous lying bastard. You're a fucking idiot pal. Plain and simple.

That's what Hitler said. Literally. I can smell the Nazi on your breath.

1 point

Anti-Fascism Is So Big That The Trump Fascists Had To Declare It A Terrorist Threat. LOL!

I agree. ANTIFA is a weak little group of basement dewllers that can only make noise if a left wing mayor lets them.

1 point

I like it when you discredit yourself because it saves me work.

You didn't mention anything in the debate, much less debunk it.

Fascism has largely been falsely identified by the far left as being part of the far-right since World War II. There is also a Communist party directive dated back to as early as 1943 that demands that any Communists who encounter any opposition towards their plans are to call their opponents, among other things, fascists and nazis.[49]

https://www.conservapedia.com/Fascism

1 point

Lol. Conservapedia.

Pretty stupid to use a source we just proved has far left wing bias

https://www.heartland.org/news-opinion/news/uncovered-wikipedias-leftist-ties-and-its-censorship-of-the-facts

as your source to attack another source.

1 point

That endeavor revealed that despite the site’s claims of being a neutral source of information, many of those leading Wikipedia have intimate ties to far-left organizations or openly support liberal policies and candidates.

Sue Gardner is just one example. She is the former executive director of the Wikimedia Foundation and served in that role from December 2007 to May 2014. Her influence on Wikipedia is substantial and unquestioned. She was even named one of the 100 most powerful women in the world by Forbes in 2012.

In addition to serving on Wikimedia’s Board of Trustees, Gardner has held a leadership position with the “nonpartisan” Sunlight Foundation (SF). SF has been funded by numerous left-wing organizations, such as the George Soros-funded Open Society Foundation and the Knight Foundation. SF even received $1 million in 2010 from the left-leaning Rockefeller Family Fund.

Also connected to SF is Wikipedia founder and Wikimedia Board of Trustees member Jimmy Wales, who serves on the SF Advisory Board. Wales is not only connected to leftist groups through his role at the Sunlight Foundation, he also has close personal ties to multiple left-wing bigshots. Wales even attended one of George Soros’ birthday parties, according to The New York Times.

Other Wikimedia Board of Trustees members have less extravagant ties to leftist causes but still openly admit they support such causes and politicians. Guy Kawasaki, Wikipedia’s “internet evangelist,” announced his support of Barack Obama on Election Day in 2012.

In one of her blog posts, Wikipedia board member Phoebe Ayers lamented that she had “white privilege” and reminisced about rifle-carrying “rednecks,” to whom she referred as “drunken yokel[s],” whose proximity she had to endure while growing up in the South. In another post, she applauded Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) for her “stands on the environment … and women’s issues” and worried someday the “unthinkable” might happen in California: A Republican could get elected.

https://www.heartland.org/news-opinion/news/uncovered-wikipedias-leftist-ties-and-its-censorship-of-the-facts

1 point

Your problem being that Conservapedia is a partisan hack site

Your problem being that so is wikipedia.

as its own name clearly suggests

The Nazi's name suggests they were Socialists.

1 point

The right prefers driving cars into protesters, shooting them (and cops), tiki-torch marches, etc.

The left has killed many cops. The last claim of a right winger running into protesters was proven false. It was a teenage girl who they tried to pull out of her car window.

Instead of being triggered by material related to sexual abuse

The right has went after Biden and Clintonfor sexual abuse.

their trigger warnings are about nudity, gayness

I know no right wingers who care on any subtantive level about nudity or gayness. You're creating a strawman rather than attacking anything right wingers of any numbers actually say. When the left says it's pro gay, it clearly doesn't mean pro gay right winger. They've attacked them relentlessly, even to the point of violence and using fire bombs.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna715711

or that big sky popa is as real as the tooth fairy, etc.

That all Muslims and most left wingers believe in. The only reason to attack a god that Muslims and most leftists believe in is if you're a full blown, disingenuous bigot whose "tolerance" is a mask rather than any actual principled position that you take in real life.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here