The argument that one race is superior to another is a simple fallacy that can be easily shown by an example of time periods. Assuming we are talking about the European dominance of the later centuries of human history here. To argue that they are simply a superior race is nonsense. They merely had superior technology and military prowess at that time.

There have been many civilizations in the past that were far ahead of the Europeans during certain time periods. Which under the very same logic would make the Europeans "inferior". Different circumstances and historical timeline have shown many "races" to seem "superior" who now in this modern age seem to be at a disadvantage. The argument that one race is inferior to another race doesn't stand the test of time as shown in human history, for one race to be superior over another would imply that they have been and will always be superior.