Imagine a miracle. Could your brain handle it? You'd probably throw it in the recycle bin the moment was over. Fear LORD's Word.

Of course and by no means do I intentionally add to the confusion of contradictions between holy scriptures, rather I give scripture new meaning. The Preachatician presents a stipulative definition God's Word, as opposed to a lexical definition, which can be true or false.

STIPULATIVE DEFINITION: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stipulative_definition

LEXICAL DEFINITION: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lexical_definition

There are exactly 256 distinct forms of categorical syllogism: 4 kinds of major premise multiplied by 4 kinds of minor premise multiplied by 4 kinds of conclusion multiplied by 4 relative positions of the middle term.

None are practical, like the one argument I have presented.

The four relative positions each have 6 types of valid categorical syllogism in virtue of Aristotle's descriptions.

1: the unconditionally valid AAA, EAE, AII, and EIO; and the conditionally valid AAI and EAO.

2: the unconditionally valid EAE, AEE, EIO, and AOO; and the conditonally valid AEO and EAO.

3: the unconditionally valid IAI, AII, OAO, and EIO; and the conditonally valid AAI and EAO.

4: the unconditionally valid AEE, IAI, and EIO; and the unconditonally valid AEO, EAO, and AAI.

No God derived from the 6 forms of categorical syllogisms under the four relative positions presented are the God reasoned by the one practical syllogism I know to exist.

P1: ALL SPACE-TIME IS ESSENCE (timing and meeting all the deadlines are essential and required for the end is near)

P2: ALL ESSENCE PRECEDES EXISTENCE (before something can exist it must exist in the mind of a creator)

C: ALL EXISTENCE PRECEDES SPACE-TIME (the mind of a creator precedes the universe)

DEFINITION OF IDIOM P1: http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/Time+is+of+the+essence

DEFINITION OF IDIOM P2: http://faculty.smu.edu/jkazez/mol09/Sartre%20Handout.htm

THE ABOVE IS A PRACTICAL SYLLOGISM. THE ABOVE IS NOT A CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM.

PRACTICAL SYLLOGISM: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Practical_syllogism

NIHIL ES IN INTELLECTU QUOD NON PRIUS FUERIT IN SENSU

"Nothing is in the intellect that was not previously in the senses."

The above is a central claim of empiricism claiming that ALL knowledge arises from the senses and experience and hence, that no knowledge is innate.

His scene is not the magic world of the imagination where the poet elicits perfection; nor is the scene set in England and what matters historical accuracy.

In no way does saving someone follow from killing someone.

Hello! ;) rapturous LICKALOTAPUSS . . . You lookin' for a MEGASAURASS tonight?

Hey, jealousy of what is not is not what it is and is what it is not.

Question: What is love?

Answer: Breadth compared to the existence-communication

of the subjective thinker.